Development and Validation of the Teacher-Student Relationship Inventory Using Exploratory and Confirmatory Factor Analysis
By Rebecca Pei-Hui Ang. 2005
175 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Education
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/4141ff39fc9aa33f31ef3d934e690c410353eafb
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Education
- S. Rimm-Kaufman
- Gerda Hagenauer
- B. Hamre
- S. Jeyaraj
- Vathsala Sagayadevan
- Simone E. Volet
- T. Hascher
- Hunter Gehlbach
Citations in the corpus
- Measure Twice, Cut down Error: A Process for Enhancing the Validity of Survey Scales (2011, background): “For example, one item, “I like this student,” from the Teacher-Student Relationship Inventory (Ang, 2005) was reworded to “How much do you like Student X’s personality?””
- The Role of Psychological and Developmental Science in Efforts to Improve Teacher Quality (2010, background): “Learning in classrooms, by definition, is a socially interactive process, and the quality of teachers’ relationships with their students has been shown to be important from preschool through the high school years (Croninger & Lee, 2001; Hamre & Pianta, 2001), both in relation to students’ bonding to”
- Teacher Wellbeing: The Importance of Teacher–Student Relationships (2011, unknown): “…such as the widely used and well-validated Student – Teacher Relationship Scale, to measure teacher perceptions of conflict, closeness, and (sometimes) dependency in their relationships with specific children from preschool to upper elementary school (Ang 2005; Pianta 2001; Koomen et al .”
- The role of emotional engagement in lecturer-student interaction and the impact on academic outcomes of student achievement and learning (2012, methodology): “Questions on emotional support were adapted from the Instrumental help subscale (Cronbach's α = .95) of the Teacher-Student Relationship Inventory (Ang, 2005) and the Teacher-student relationship subscale (Cronbach's α = .88) of the Student Engagement Instrument (SEI) (Appleton et al., 2006).”
- Teacher Efficacy In the Context of Teaching Low Achieving Students (2008, background): “Teacher–Student Relationship Inventory (TSRI) The fourteen-item TSRI (Ang 2005) assesses teacher perceptions of the quality of their relationship with students from upper primary through secondary school.”
- Teacher-student relationship and mathematical problem-solving ability: mediating roles of self-efficacy and mathematical anxiety (2020, background): “…on the attachment theory (Bowlby, 1980) and found that a supportive teacher–student relationship was positively related to students’ maths performance from Grade 1 to Grade 9 (Ang, 2005; Hamre & Pianta, 2001; Roorda, Koomen, Spit, & Oort, 2011; Valiente, Lemery-Chalfant, Swanson, & Re, 2008).”
- The Influence of Affective Teacher–Student Relationships on Students’ School Engagement and Achievement (2011, unknown): “*Ang, R. P. (2005). Development and validation”
- Teacher emotions in the classroom: associations with students’ engagement, classroom discipline and the interpersonal teacher-student relationship (2015, methodology): “A “closeness” scale, adapted from Ang (2005) and Pianta (2001), measured students’ relational behaviour reflecting the interpersonal TSR. Recently, Klassen et al. (2013) have developed a similar scale called “social engagement,” a sub-scale of the “Engaged Teacher Scale.””
- Affective Teacher–Student Relationships and Students' Engagement and Achievement: A Meta-Analytic Update and Test of the Mediating Role of Engagement (2017, unknown): “…Studies Author Year Students (N) p/s rpe rne rpa rna rpn rea Allen & Fraser 2007 120 p .11 – .05 – – – Al–Yagon & Mikulincer 2004 205 p – – .19 −.33 −.38 – Ang 2005 266 p – – .22 −.03 −.45 – Arbeau et al. 2010 169 p .22 −.23 – – −.48 – Archambault et al. 2013 1,145 p .40 – .17 – –…”