When demand accelerates demand: Trailing the bandwagon
By E. Herpen, Rik Pieters, M. Zeelenberg. 2009
232 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Applied Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Marketing
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/408ed51972b29c0b8f5c567981c8c27c195185e9
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Applied Psychology
- L. Chaplin
- D. Thompson
- Deborah Roedder John
- Vladas Griskevicius
- Meng Zhu
- Donald R. Lehmann
- Ronald Paul Hill
- Rebecca W. Hamilton
In Cognitive Neuroscience
- L. Chaplin
- Deborah Roedder John
- Vladas Griskevicius
- Meng Zhu
- Donald R. Lehmann
- Anuj K. Shah
- Paul K. Piff
In Marketing
- L. Chaplin
- Deborah Roedder John
- D. Thompson
- Rebecca W. Hamilton
- Vladas Griskevicius
- Meng Zhu
- Donald R. Lehmann
- Jeffrey R. Parker
Citations in the corpus
- The Effect of Consumer Persuasion Knowledge on Scarcity Appeal Persuasiveness (2013, background): “Supply-related scarcity (SRS) appeals, such as “supplies are limited” and “while supplies last,” communicate a product’s distribution shortage, which can signal product value, quality, or exclusivity to consumers (DeGraba 1995; Lynn 1992a; Van Herpen, Pieters, and Zeelenberg 2009).”
- The effects of scarcity on consumer decision journeys (2018, background): “For example, product scarcity may be due to excessive demand or to restricted supply (Roy and Sharma 2015; Van Herpen et al. 2009).”
- When Shelf-based Scarcity Impacts Consumer Preferences (2011, background): “While many of the above assumptions (inferences) are plausible, recent work by van Herpen, Pieters, and Zeelenberg (2009) finds that consumers in retail environments (i) tend to infer that scarcer products are more popular and of higher quality, and (ii) are generally more likely to choose scarcer…”