Comparison of Three Meta-Analytic Procedures for Estimating Moderating Effects of Categorical Variables

By Herman Aguinis, M. Sturman, C. Pierce. 2008

105 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Applied Psychology, Information Systems and Management, Management Science and Operations Research

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/40521c76f9558b084c957c44846326b27f7a83da

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Applied Psychology

In Information Systems and Management

In Management Science and Operations Research

Citations in the corpus

Revealed or Concealed? Transparency of Procedures, Decisions, and Judgment Calls in Meta-Analyses (2012, background): “These choices and judgment calls are widely thought to affect the results and conclusions of meta-analyses (Aguinis et al., 2008; Bobko & Roth, 2008; Geyskens et al., 2009; Kisamore & Brannick, 2008; Wanous et al., 1989).”
Cognitive and Affective Job Insecurity: A Meta-Analysis and a Primary Study (2018, methodology): “…categories (i.e., CJI, AJI, MJI) or fewer than 10 overall independent samples for the categorical predictor with two categories (i.e., CJI vs. AJI; CJI vs. MJI; AJI vs. MJI), we used the formula proposed by Aguinis, Sturman, and Pierce (2007) to compare the effect sizes between two categories.”
Corporate Carbon and Financial Performance: A Meta‐analysis (2018, methodology): “Meta-analytic techniques also comprise applications and indicators for the identification of study characteristics that are assumed to affect empirical findings (Aguinis et al. 2008).”
Age and work‐related motives: Results of a meta‐analysis (2011, methodology): “First, in accord with the recommendation by Aguinis, Sturman, and Pierce (2008) for analysis of the moderating effect of categorical variables in the absence of strong theory-based hypotheses, we used the Hunter and Schmidt (2004) procedure in which the mean effect sizes are compared across groups…”
Beyond intrinsic and extrinsic motivation: A meta-analysis on self-determination theory’s multidimensional conceptualization of work motivation (2021, unknown): “Following Aguinis et al.’s (2008) recommendations, we used Hunter and Schmidt’s (2004) procedures for a subgroup analysis with categorical variables.”
Institutional Logics in the Study of Organizations: The Social Construction of the Relationship between Corporate Social and Financial Performance (2011, methodology): “Another method, Hedges and Olkin’s chi-square test for heterogeneity, can also be used to detect moderators (Aguinis et al., 2008).”
3 Staffing Twenty‐first‐century Organizations (2008, unknown): “Corrected correlations are adjusted upwardly for the effects of measurement error, range restriction, and other methodological and statistical artifacts (Aguinis, Sturman, & Pierce, 2008 ).”
Scale Coarseness as a Methodological Artifact (2009, background): “, Hedges & Olkin, 1985; Hunter & Schmidt, 2004) or in any of the articles published in the ORM feature topic on meta-analysis in January 2008 (Aguinis et al., 2008; Bobko & Roth, 2008; Dalton & Dalton, 2008; Kisamore & Brannick, 2008; Schmidt, 2008; Steel & Kammeyer-Mueller, 2008; Wood, 2008).”
Benefits of training and development for individuals and teams, organizations, and society. (2009, background): “We emphasize that results from meta-analytic reviews should generally be given more weight than individual (i.e., primary-level) studies because they are more reliable (Aguinis et al. 2008).”