The effect of bimodal input on implicit and explicit memory: An investigation into the benefits of within-language subtitling
By Stephen A. Bird, John N. Williams. 2002
272 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Developmental and Educational Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Language and Linguistics
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/3fb2cb973988e1c8ca007e4521b7a5a9ba08ca18
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Developmental and Educational Psychology
- Paula M. Winke
- Martine Danan
- Jong-Hyeong Kim
- Hyewon Youn
- Kathy Conklin
- Walter J. B. van Heuven
- R. Vanderplank
- S. Gass
In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
- Martine Danan
- Paula M. Winke
- Jong-Hyeong Kim
- Hyewon Youn
- Richard J. Tunney
- Kathy Conklin
- Walter J. B. van Heuven
- Marie-Josée Bisson
In Language and Linguistics
- Paula M. Winke
- Tetyana Sydorenko
- S. Gass
- R. Vanderplank
- Martine Danan
- Kathy Conklin
- Luke Plonsky
- E. Peters
Citations in the corpus
- Captioning and Subtitling: Undervalued Language Learning Strategies (2004, background): “…captioning clearly aids with the phonological visualization of aural cues in the minds of listeners, who become more certain of ambiguous input, can more accurately form a memory trace of the words, and can later more easily identify identical sounds without textual support (Bird & Williams, 2002).”
- Modality of input and vocabulary acquisition (2010, background): “Language Learning & Technology 56 (2001), Bird and Williams (2002), and Danan (1992), the word knowledge test was not given before the study in order to avoid prompting the participants to pay special attention to new words.”
- The effects of captioning videos used for foreign language listening activities (2010, methodology): “One of the most robust experiments along this line was conducted by Bird and Williams (2002), who investigated the claim that captioning is a beneficial language learning tool by looking at how a bimodal presentation (aural and visual) of novel words would affect the learning of the words.”
- Processing of native and foreign language subtitles in films: An eye tracking study (2012, background): “Written words in intralingual subtitling are not affected by intonation, accents, or background noise; thus, having access to both the soundtrack and subtitles allows for easier word segmentation by indicating which words are being spoken (Bird & Williams, 2002; Mitterer & McQueen, 2009).”
- How to Design and Deliver Stories about Tourism Destinations (2017, background): “Presentation mode has received considerable attention from researchers because the manner in which information is received affects both the encoding and the retrieval process of memory (Beaman 2002; Bird and Williams 2002).”
- ‘Effects of’ and ‘effects with’ captions: How exactly does watching a TV programme with same-language subtitles make a difference to language learners? (2013, background): “• Bird & Williams (2002) showed that exposure to captions appears to improve listeningbased recognition of words that re-occur later without captions as well as implicit learning of words.”