The effects of captioning videos used for foreign language listening activities
By Paula M. Winke, S. Gass, Tetyana Sydorenko. Language Learning & Technology, 2010
401 citations recorded by the source corpus.
This study investigated the effects of captioning during video-based listening activities. Second- and fourth-year learners of Arabic, Chinese, Spanish, and Russian watched three short videos with and without captioning in randomized order. Spanish learners had two additional groups: one watched the videos twice with no captioning, and another watched them twice with captioning. After the second showing of the video, learners took comprehension and vocabulary tests based on the video. Twenty-six learners participated in interviews following the actual experiment. They were asked about their general reactions to the videos (captioned and noncaptioned). Results from t-tests and two-way ANOVAs indicated that captioning was more effective than no captioning. Captioning during the first showing of the videos was more effective for performance on aural vocabulary tests. For Spanish and Russian, captioning first was generally more effective than captioning second; while for Arabic and Chinese, there was a trend toward captioning second being more effective. The interview data revealed that learners used captions to increase their attention, improve processing, reinforce previous knowledge, and analyze language. Learners also reported using captions as a crutch.
Subfields: Language and Linguistics
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e5ff6d307941c4e621a3c379bfb14ac124d7b6d5
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Language and Linguistics
Citations in the corpus
- Extensive viewing of captioned and subtitled TV series: a study of L2 vocabulary learning by adolescents (2019, background): “The general consensus in this area is that captions provide more exposure to the target language, thus being more beneficial for language learning and vocabulary acquisition (e.g. Danan 2004; Vanderplank 2010; Winke et al. 2010).”