The Impact Of Collectivism And In-Group/Out-Group Membership On The Evaluation Generosity Of Team Members

By Carolina Gómez, Bradley L Kirkman, Debra L. Shapiro. 2000

246 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Communication, Gender Studies, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/3f64dc2dd6fa58a2a4347930da0c181545b833a5

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Communication

In Gender Studies

In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

Citations in the corpus

A quarter century of Culture's Consequences: a review of empirical research incorporating Hofstede's cultural values framework (2006, methodology): “After showing that Mexican MBAs were significantly more collectivistic than US students, Gomez et al. (2000) found that collectivists gave more generous evaluations to in-group, rather than out-group, members in a teamwork”
Research on leadership in a cross-cultural context: Making progress, and raising new questions (2003, background): “Gomez, Kirkman, and Shapiro (2000) found that collectivists gave more generous evaluations to ingroup members than did individualists, and Kirkman and Shapiro (2000) found collectivism to be positively related to receptivity to team-based rewards.”
Offshore information systems project success: the role of social embeddedness and cultural characteristics (2009, background): “Although Hofstede’s work has conceptualized these cultural values at the national level, they have been treated as being espoused at the individual level in much prior work (e.g., Bochner and Hesketh 1994; Cox et al. 1991; Earley 1989, 1993; Gomez et al. 2001; Srite and Karahanna 2006) and consisten”
Cross-cultural organizational behavior. (2007, background): “For example, what counts in terms of contributions or inputs when making reward allocation decisions varies across cultures (Fischer & Smith 2004, Gomez et al. 2000, Hundley & Kim 1997, Zhou & Martocchio 2001).”
Cronyism: a cross-cultural analysis (2006, background): “For example, in the Martha Stewart case, evidence supports classifying power relations as peer and Waksal’s motivation as based on relationship, affection, and loyalty rather than self-interest.”