Teacher Technology Change

By Peggy A. Ertmer, Anne T. Ottenbreit-Leftwich. 2010

1,800 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/3de70c9cea762e4516b1a191d255598ec9aa7358

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Education

In Gender Studies

Citations in the corpus

Risk-aversion: understanding teachers’ resistance to technology integration (2013, background): “This finding is in agreement with research identifying the power of social pressure in schools (e.g. Ertmer & Ottenbreit-Leftwich, 2010; Zhao & Frank, 2003).”
Teachers' Perceptions of Integrating Information and Communication Technologies into Literacy Instruction: A National Survey in the United States (2011, background): “(p. 27) Further, there is ample evidence that teachers’ beliefs, including their beliefs about their own efﬁcacy (see Ertmer & Ottenbreit-Leftwich, 2010) in integrating technology into instruction, play a predominant role in how they conceptualize and use computer-based technologies in their…”
Teachers’ online teaching expectations and experiences during the Covid19-pandemic in the Netherlands (2020, background): “…traditional pedagogical technologies such as a Smartboard or PowerPoint are widely accepted and used, the actual integration of technology-supported teaching for pedagogical purposes is yet another level (Bruce and Hogan 1998; Ertmer and Ottenbreit-Leftwich 2010; Romeo, Lloyd, and Downes 2012).”
The effects of integrating mobile devices with teaching and learning on students' learning performance: A meta-analysis and research synthesis (2016, background): “Researchers have pointed out that computer interventions in education have not yet led to practical implementations of innovative educational methods (Ertmer & Ottenbreit-Leftwich, 2010; Gerard, Varma, Corliss, & Linn, 2011).”
Teacher value beliefs associated with using technology: Addressing professional and student needs (2010, background): “Many barriers, summarized in previous reviews (e.g., Ertmer, 1999; Ertmer & Ottenbreit-Leftwich, 2010; Hew & Brush, 2007), appear to prevent these uses.”
Removing obstacles to the pedagogical changes required by Jonassen's vision of authentic technology-enabled learning (2013, background): “Furthermore, as noted by Ertmer and Ottenbreit-Leftwich (2010), this shared vision, while not focused on technology per se, should include a definition of good teaching that incorporates the idea of students learning with technology.”
Teacher beliefs and technology integration practices: A critical relationship (2012, background): “These are the types of results teachers need to hear more about if they are to be convinced that using technology will enable their students to perform as expected on state assessments (Ertmer & Ottenbreit-Leftwich, 2010).”
Teachers' perceptions of the barriers to technology integration and practices with technology under situated professional development (2012, background): “Since teachers with strong beliefs are more likely to persist in their attempts to integrate technology (Ertmer & Ottenbreit-Leftwich, 2010; Ottenbreit-Leftwich et al., 2010; Vannatta & Fordham, 2004), it is difficult to assess the influence of participant's beliefs on the results of this study.”