Implicit acquisition and manifestation of classically conditioned attitudes.

By Michael A. Olson, R. Fazio. 2002

166 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Developmental and Educational Psychology, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/3cee9db8dac4f4fa902d8169decabb90ef71a38b

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Developmental and Educational Psychology

In Social Psychology

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

Implicit measures in social cognition. research: their meaning and use. (2003, methodology): “In an experiment concerning implicit attitude formation via classical conditioning, Olson & Fazio (2002b) had participants undergo a visual task in which one novel stimulus was consistently paired with positively valued stimuli and another with negatively valued stimuli.”
Attitudes as Object-Evaluation Associations of Varying Strength. (2007, background): “Additional evidence, well beyond the administration of an implicit measure, is required to make any such inference (see Olson & Fazio, 2002, for an example).”
Implicit measures: A normative analysis and review. (2009, background): “Second, when novel attitudes are created in the lab, they can lead to affective priming effects even when participants are not aware of how the attitudes were acquired (e.g., Olson & Fazio, 2002).”
The Influence of Affect on Attitude (2005, result): “In support of this possibility, Olson and Fazio (2002) note that a previous study (Fazio, Lenn, & Effrein, 1984) had shown consolidation of evaluative information into an attitude only after direct questions about attitude.”
Novel attitudes can be faked on the Implicit Association Test (2007, background): “Since the inXuential work of researchers such as Zajonc (1980), Fazio (1990), and Greenwald and Banaji (1995), it is generally accepted that implicit attitudes (i.”
Social Justice in Our Minds, Homes, and Society: The Nature, Causes, and Consequences of Implicit Bias (2004, background): “For example, stereotypic media portrayals might classically condition people’s implicit attitudes without their being aware of this effect (cf. Olson and Fazio, 2002).”
Ten Frequently Asked Questions About Implicit Measures and Their Frequently Supposed, But Not Entirely Correct Answers (2009, methodology): “The evaluative priming task can be used to assess evaluative responses to any type of object that can be presented as a prime stimulus in a sequential priming paradigm, and it has been successfully used with supraliminal (e.g., Fazio et al., 1995) and subliminal presentations of the primes (e.g., O”
Implicit consumer preferences and their influence on product choice (2006, background): “perspective it might be important to note that Olson and Fazio (2001, 2002) used novel objects”
Unresolved problems with the “I”, the “A”, and the “T”: A logical and psychometric critique of the Implicit Association Test (IAT) (2006, background): “…undergo differential treatments so that one group differs from the other only in attitudes (i.e., conditioned evaluation, cf. Baccus et al., 2004; Olson & Fazio, 2001, 2002; C. J. Mitchell et al., 2003) but no other systematic factor (as recently in Wänke, De Houwer, Plessner, Richter, &…”
12. Formation, change, and contextualization of mental associations: determinants and principles of variations in implicit measures (2010, methodology): “Self-presentational effects in the Implicit Association Test.”
The Dominance of Associative Theorizing in Implicit Attitude Research: Propositional and Behavioral Alternatives (2011, background): “…experimentally induced and manipulated novel implicit and explicit evaluations toward fictitious social groups in the laboratory for which no previously stored attitude could be responsible (e.g., De Houwer, 2006b; Hughes & Barnes-Holmes, 2011; Olson & Fazio, 2001, 2002; Ranganath & Nosek, 2008).”