Implicit measures in social cognition. research: their meaning and use.

By R. Fazio, Michael A. Olson. Annual Review of Psychology, 2003

2,696 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Applied Psychology, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/23d7af4c9b023b3a265f79b68b949d214395830f

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Applied Psychology

In Social Psychology

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

The Effectiveness of "in-Game" Advertising: Comparing College Students' Explicit and Implicit Memory for Brand Names (2006, background): “…recent research regarding implicit attitudes has suggested that attitudes can be primed without explicit memory of previous exposure to the attitude object (Olson and Fazio 2001) and implicit attitudes have been demonstrated to be a good predictor of the related behavior (Fazio and Olson 2003).”
Does Japan really have robot mania? Comparing attitudes by implicit and explicit measures (2008, background): “There is nothing about the procedures of implicit measures that ensures participants are not aware of their attitudes or that the response is ‘‘accessed’’ rather than constructed ( Fazio and Olson 2003 ).”
Science and God: An automatic opposition between ultimate explanations (2009, methodology): “Participants completed a semantic priming paradigm with a categorization task (Fazio & Olson, 2003).”
Associative and propositional processes in evaluation: an integrative review of implicit and explicit attitude change. (2006, background): “Fazio and Olson (2003), for example, argue that cognitive elaboration is a crucial determinant of people’s success in suppressing the influence of automatic attitudes on evaluative judgments.”
Implicit Attitudes and Discrimination Against People with Physical Disabilities (2011, positive): “…explicit measures of prejudice typically utilize direct self-reports of attitudes, implicit measures utilize a variety of techniques, including indirect self-report responses, such as word fragment completions, linguistic cues, attributions and explanations (for a review, see Fazio & Olson, 2003).”
Understanding and using the Implicit Association Test: III. Meta-analysis of predictive validity. (2009, background): “Administering criterion measures in sessions separate from the assessment of IAT or self-report predictors might minimize mutual influences between predictor and criterion measures (Fazio & Olson, 2003; Kraus, 1995).”
The implicit association test outperforms the extrinsic affective Simon task as an implicit measure of inter-individual differences in attitudes. (2007, background): “During the past decade, implicit measures of attitudes have become popular in various subdisciplines of psychology (see Fazio & Olson, 2003, for a review).”
Bringing appraisal theory to environmental risk perception: a review of conceptual approaches of the past 40 years and suggestions for future research (2012, background): “The currently low utilization of this approach is likely due to various continued conceptual and methodological issues and controversies within the field (Fazio and Olson 2003 ), but as the field is developed further, it is becoming increasingly fruitful.”
Seeing green: Mere exposure to money triggers a business decision frame and unethical outcomes (2013, background): “Word-completion tests have been shown to assess implicit cognitive processes (for a review see Fazio & Olson, 2003), thus allowing us to test whether or not participants’ choice of words and their implicit thought processes were influenced by the prime.”
Surfing the urge: Experiential acceptance moderates the relation between automatic alcohol motivation and hazardous drinking (2008, neutral): “Of the variety of measures used to assess automatic stimulus–affect associations (see Fazio & Olson, 2003), the one that has become most widely used is the Implicit Association Test (IAT; Greenwald, McGhee, & Schwartz, 1998).”
“How much do you like your name?” An implicit measure of global self-esteem (2008, background): “Thus, if participants respond to our Name-Liking measure without directly indicating their self-theories of their self-esteem, Name-Liking formally classifies as an implicit measure of selfesteem (Bosson et al., 2000; Fazio & Olson, 2003).”
Religious Appeals and Implicit Attitudes (2011, methodology): “Implicit measures are used to measure implicit attitudes, but Fazio and Olson (2003) point out that implicit measures do not always capture implicit attitudes.”
On Assessing the Political Effects of Racial Prejudice (2009, background): “We do not claim to provide a comprehensive review of all research on racial prejudice or its political effects, which is a large and growing field especially within social psychology (see Quillian 2006, Fazio & Olsen 2003, Hutchings & Valentino 2004 for related articles in Annual Reviews series).”