Implicit measures: A normative analysis and review.
By J. de Houwer, Sarah Teige-Mocigemba, Adriaan Spruyt, Agnes Moors. Psychological bulletin, 2009
865 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Applied Psychology, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/58d3657a036592f6ba64686734e00afaecf9e82a
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Applied Psychology
- Bertram Gawronski
- Wilhelm Hofmann
- Reinout W. Wiers
- J. de Houwer
- D. Barnes-Holmes
- Alan W. Stacy
- Brian K. Payne
- Brian A. Nosek
In Social Psychology
- Bertram Gawronski
- J. de Houwer
- D. Barnes-Holmes
- Wilhelm Hofmann
- Brian A. Nosek
- Sean Hughes
- Brian K. Payne
- Nigel Vahey
In Sociology and Political Science
- Bertram Gawronski
- J. de Houwer
- Wilhelm Hofmann
- D. Barnes-Holmes
- Brian A. Nosek
- Brian K. Payne
- Reinout W. Wiers
- Sean Hughes
Citations in the corpus
- Implicit measures: similarities and differences (2010, methodology): “measurement theory that is necessary to establish the validity of a measure (Borsboom et al., 2004; De Houwer et al., 2009a ).”
- Cognitive Bias Modification and Cognitive Control Training in Addiction and Related Psychopathology (2013, background): “Importantly, all measures need to be validated regarding their “implicit” properties (De Houwer et al., 2009).”
- Implicit Racial/Ethnic Bias Among Health Care Professionals and Its Influence on Health Care Outcomes: A Systematic Review. (2015, background): “The IAT is the most widely known implicit measure but also the most controversial.(52,61) A final limitation was the narrowness in measurement of implicit bias.”
- Implicit Social Cognitions Predict Sex Differences in Math Engagement and Achievement (2011, background): “Its validity is evident in the results and its voluminous literature (see De Houwer et al., 2009; Nosek, Smyth et al. 2007), but it is possible that employing a diversity of implicit measures will improve the measurement and assessment of implicit STEM cognitions.”
- Holding on to our functional roots when exploring new intellectual islands: A voyage through implicit cognition research (2012, background): “…necessary for non-automatic mental activity and thus non-automatic behavior (e.g., non-efficient, aware, controllable and intentional; see De Houwer et al., 2009).3 In other words, ‘‘the correspondence between the conditions established by a certain kind of measurement procedure (indirect…”
- Indirect Measures of Sexual Interest in Child Sex Offenders (2010, background): “Conclusions about deviant or nondeviant sexual interest can be drawn with greater confidence if they are based on several conceptually different, convergent, and valid indirect measures (De Houwer et al., 2009).”
- Comparing measures of approach–avoidance behaviour: The manikin task vs. two versions of the joystick task (2010, background): “If a measure is sensitive to variations in the to-be-measured construct it also can be considered as a valid measure of this construct (Borsboom, Mellenbergh, & van Heerden, 2004 ; De Houwer, Teige-Mocigemba, Spruyt, & Moors, 2009 ).”
- Third wave positive psychology: broadening towards complexity (2020, background): “Rather than polarization, the second wave is reflected by ‘dynamic harmonization’ of dichotomous states, and ‘balancing opposite elements into a whole’ (Delle Fave et al., 2011, p. 199).”
- The Dominance of Associative Theorizing in Implicit Attitude Research: Propositional and Behavioral Alternatives (2011, neutral): “Recent work by De Houwer and colleagues may prove useful in this respect (e.g., De Houwer, 2006a, 2006b; De Houwer & Moors, 2007; De Houwer et al., 2009a).”
- Gender Stereotypes in the Family Context: Mothers, Fathers, and Siblings (2013, background): “A weakness is that it is not entirely clear whether implicit tasks indeed measure a person’s own stereotypes, or culturally shared attitudes (De Houwer et al., 2009).”