Attitudes as Object-Evaluation Associations of Varying Strength.

By R. Fazio. Social Cognition, 2007

812 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/642000142e26cdc6b02066ec7eee0a5eae325502

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Social Psychology

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

When the method makes a difference: Antagonistic effects on “automatic evaluations” as a function of task characteristics of the measure (2009, background): “At the same time, it is also possible that attention to evaluative attributes of an object modulates automatic evaluations of that object (Fazio, 2007).”
The Dominance of Associative Theorizing in Implicit Attitude Research: Propositional and Behavioral Alternatives (2011, methodology): “Indeed, the associative assumption has been formalized in a range of contemporary models that view the behavioral outcomes generated by indirect procedures as causally produced by the associative activation and interplay of mental representations in memory (e.g., Albarracin, glasman, & Wallace, 2004”
The Associative–Propositional Evaluation Model: Theory, Evidence, and Open Questions (2011, background): “…evaluations should show stronger relations when cognitive elaboration during the generation of an evaluative judgment is low rather than high (e.g., Fazio, 2007; Wilson, Lindsey, & Schooler, 2000) and the available evidence is mostly consistent with this assumption (e.g., Florack, Scarabis, &…”
I like you, I like you not: Understanding the formation of context-dependent automatic attitudes (2009, methodology): “For this reason, Experiment 2 sought to rectify any problems regarding the interpretation of the AMP data by additionally including a variant of Fazio et al.’s (1995) affective priming task.”
The Unmet Potential of Interdisciplinary Research: Political Psychological Approaches to Voting and Public Opinion (2009, background): “A sizable psychological literature emerged that identified conditions under which people subconsciously process whatever is ‘‘on top of their heads,’’ engage in more conscious deliberation, and sometimes do the opposite of what is immediately accessible (e.g., Bargh et al. 1986; Fazio 1995, 2007; ”
Foxhole atheism, revisited: The effects of mortality salience on explicit and implicit religious belief (2012, background): “…model of religious cognition, in which people hold both explicit religious beliefs, in the form of analyzable, conscious, and reportable attitudes, and implicit religious beliefs in the form of unconscious cognitive associations between religious and existential concepts (cf. Fazio, 2007).”
Narcissistic Fragility: Rethinking Its Links to Explicit and Implicit Self-esteem (2010, background): “Moreover, given that attitudes can be defined as attribute–object associations (Fazio, 2007), indirect measures can be construed as measures of implicit attitude (Wittenbrink & Schwarz, 2007).”
Attitude, Inference, Association: On the Propositional Structure of Implicit Bias (2016, background): “…Fazio moves from associative learning to associative structure : " In brief , the model views attitudes as associations between a given object and a given summary evaluation of the object – associations that can vary in strength and , hence , in their accessibility from memory " ( Fazio 2007 p4 ) .”
Implicit measures in social and personality psychology (2014, methodology): “To illustrate this argument, consider the task demands in Fazio et al.'s (1986) evaluative priming task and Payne et al.”
Affective Contagion in Effortful Political Thinking (2014, background): “Our most fundamental theoretical assumption is that both affective and cognitive reactions to external and internal events are triggered unconsciously and spread activation in memory through associative pathways that link feelings to thoughts to behaviors (Anderson, 1983; Fazio, 2007; Lodge & Taber,”
Implicit measures: A normative analysis and review. (2009, background): “…to a target stimulus depends on the activation level of the concept node representing the target, a prime stimulus that is affectively related to the target stimulus could speed up responding to the target by preactivating the concept representation of the target in memory (see Fazio, 2001, 2007).”