Novel attitudes can be faked on the Implicit Association Test
By J. de Houwer, Tom Beckers, Agnes Moors. 2007
87 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ef01107f3b8d2a649c98cc2ebec6fcf2877a5830
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Cognitive Neuroscience
- A. Greenwald
- Agnes Moors
- J. de Houwer
- Adriaan Spruyt
- Sarah Teige-Mocigemba
- Dario Cvencek
- Bertram Gawronski
- R. Fazio
In Social Psychology
- J. de Houwer
- Agnes Moors
- A. Greenwald
- Adriaan Spruyt
- Dario Cvencek
- Sarah Teige-Mocigemba
- Bertram Gawronski
- Brian A. Nosek
In Sociology and Political Science
- J. de Houwer
- Agnes Moors
- A. Greenwald
- Dario Cvencek
- Adriaan Spruyt
- Sarah Teige-Mocigemba
- Bertram Gawronski
- Brian A. Nosek
Citations in the corpus
- Implicit measures: A normative analysis and review. (2009, background): “…can be consciously controlled seems to depend on a variety of variables, such as how much experience the participants have with the IAT (e.g., Fiedler & Bluemke, 2005; Steffens, 2004; see Czellar, 2006; De Houwer et al., 2007; and Schnabel, Banse, & Asendorpf, 2006, for other moderating variables).”
- Faking of the Implicit Association Test Is Statistically Detectable and Partly Correctable (2010, background): “Previous research has shown that participants can effectively fake novel associations (De Houwer et al., 2007).”
- Assessment of Individual Differences in Implicit Cognition A Review of IAT Measures (2008, unknown): “Faking also appears when participants are asked to pretend to have attitudes toward fictitious target objects that they did not know previously ( De Houwer, Beckers, & Moors, 2007 ).”