Social Justice in Our Minds, Homes, and Society: The Nature, Causes, and Consequences of Implicit Bias

By Laurie A. Rudman. 2004

119 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/041b5545c891035b03099a9ead0d6af3bdf946c9

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Social Psychology

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

The Bias of Crowds: How Implicit Bias Bridges Personal and Systemic Prejudice (2017, background): “Scholarship on implicit bias takes for granted that systemic bias exists, and it is typically assumed to contribute to implicit bias (Greenwald & Krieger, 2006; Jost & Banaji, 1994; Rudman, 2004a).”
Implicit consumer preferences and their influence on product choice (2006, background): “associations that are difficult to change later on ( Rudman, 2004 ).”
Understanding and using the Implicit Association Test: III. Meta-analysis of predictive validity. (2009, background): “For example, Rudman (2004) pointed out that implicit measures sometimes correlate substantially with the (highly controllable ) responses to parallel explicit measures of attitude, such as those toward political candidates (e.g., Greenwald, Nosek, & Banaji, 2003; Nosek, 2005; Nosek & Banaji, 2002),…”
Social antecedents of children's implicit prejudice: Direct contact, extended contact, explicit and implicit teachers' prejudice (2012, background): “during development (Rudman, 2004).”
Intent and Ordinary Bias: Unintended Thought and Social Motivation Create Casual Prejudice (2004, unknown): “As a field, we have uncovered some startling results (Dasgupta, 2004; Rudman, 2004).”
Implicit Ingroup Favoritism, Outgroup Favoritism, and Their Behavioral Manifestations (2004, background): “Although they sometimes overlap with people’s explicitly reported attitudes and beliefs, the overlap is considerably variable (for a detailed discussion of the relationship between implicit and explicit attitudes, see Rudman, 2004).”
Societal and Managerial Implications of Implicit Social Cognition: Why Milliseconds Matter (2004, background): “…times for the incompatible block are interpreted as implicit race bias favoring whites, and vice versa.2 On a race IAT such as this, white Americans show an implicit bias favoring whites (with Cohen’sd effect sizes in the .71–.88 range) (Nosekt al., 2002; Rudman, 2004; Rudmanet al., in press).”