Trouble at Mill: Quality of academic worklife issues within a comprehensive Australian university

By R. Winter, Tony Taylor, J. Sarros. 2000

236 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Education, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/3ac44cf1ec400475c6eeeadd9463396a83fc82e0

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Education

1. Alan Bryman
2. R. Winter
3. J. Sarros
4. John Schulz
5. S. Rothmann
6. Don Houston
7. J. D. Creswell
8. José F. Molina-Azorίn

In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

1. Alan Bryman
2. J. Sarros
3. R. Winter
4. N. Barkhuizen
5. Raduan Che Rose
6. John Schulz
7. S. Rothmann
8. Loo-See Beh

Citations in the corpus

• Quality Of Work Life: Implications Of Career Dimensions (2006, background): “Winter et al.([17]) viewed QWL for academicians as an attitudinal response to the prevailing work environment and posited five work environment domains that include role stress, job characteristics, supervisory, structural and sectoral characteristics to directly and indirectly shape academicians’ e”
• An Analysis of Quality of Work Life (QWL) and Career- Related Variables (2006, background): “Winter et al.([19]) viewed QWL for academicians as an attitudinal response to the prevailing work environment and posited five work environment domains that include role stress, job characteristics, supervisory, structural and sectoral characteristics to directly and indirectly shape academicians’ e”
• Entangled in academic capitalism? A case-study on changing ideals and practices of university research (2003, background): “Enders and Teichler 1997; Kogan et al. 1994; Nixon 1996; Parker and Jarry 1995; Rasanen and Mantyla 2001; Smith and Webster 1997; Trowler 1998; Vidovich and Currie 1998; Winter et al. 2000 ).”
• The Academic Work Environment in Australian Universities: A motivating place to work? (2002, methodology): “Speci cally, which work environment characteristics represent high/low sources of work motivation for academics in Australian universities?”
• Academic Staff Workloads and Job Satisfaction: Expectations and values in academe (2006, background): “Challenge, variety, and autonomy are key elements of the academic work environment that enable academic staff to engage in core activities such as critical thinking, reflection, and collegial interactions in the context of disciplinary interests and expertise (Winter, Taylor, & Sarros, 2000 ).”
• Effective leadership in higher education: a literature review (2007, background): “Two studies of Australian academics found consideration to be positively related to organizational commitment, but that it was unrelated to job involvement (Winter et al., 2000; Winter & Sarros, 2002).”
• The impact of role conflict, role ambiguity and organizational climate on the job satisfaction of academic staff in research-intensive universities in the UK (2013, background): “While other researchers have reported similar ideas (Kinman & Jones, 2003; Winter et al., 2000), the emergence of specific roles with specific climates is reasonably speculative and requires more focused study.”
• Occupational Stress of Academic Staff in South African Higher Education Institutions (2008, background): “In particular, Winter, Taylor, and Sarros (2000) found that both professors and associate professors reported significantly more role overload than lecturers did.”