Book Review: Blended: Using Disruptive Innovation to Improve Schools
By T. Liao. 2015
327 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Education, Information Systems
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/3a1caca895d0199c1de2a6408536b6086a6388f0
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Education
- Lisa R. Halverson
- Emily Pulham
- Bram De Wever
- Charles R. Graham
- Michiel Voet
- Ruth Boelens
- Matthew J. Koehler
- Joshua M. Rosenberg
In Information Systems
Citations in the corpus
- Learner Engagement in Blended Learning Environments: A Conceptual Framework (2019, background): “They may include increased flexibility and personalization due to diversified learning pathways (Horn & Staker, 2015); expanded opportunities for interactivity (face-to-face as well as online and synchronous as well as asynchronous; Means, Toyama, Murphy, & Baki, 2013); technical advantages…”
- Four key challenges to the design of blended learning: A systematic literature review (2017, background): “This increased flexibility implies that learners have some level of control over time, place, path, or pace of learning (Horn & Staker, 2014).”
- Comparing K-12 online and blended teaching competencies: a literature review (2018, methodology): “In the K-12 sector, the most commonly used definition of BL describes students as learning “at least in part through online learning, with some element of student control over time, place, path and/or pace” (Horn & Staker, 2014, p. 34).”