Four key challenges to the design of blended learning: A systematic literature review

By Ruth Boelens, Bram De Wever, Michiel Voet. 2017

577 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Developmental and Educational Psychology, Education

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e1e5a6b3ab8cc52425c32927e80dc7ac438e3c62

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Developmental and Educational Psychology

1. Thanasis Daradoumis
2. José Quiroga Pérez
3. Joan Manuel Marquès Puig

In Education

1. Rasheed Abubakar Rasheed
2. Amirrudin Bin Kamsin
3. Thanasis Daradoumis
4. Marilou Bélisle
5. José Quiroga Pérez
6. Géraldine Heilporn
7. Sawsen Lakhal
8. Nor Aniza Abdullah

Citations in the corpus

• Challenges in the online component of blended learning: A systematic review (2020, background): “For example, the study of (Boelens, De Wever, & Voet, 2017b) identifies ‘incorporating flexibility’; ‘facilitating interaction’; ‘facilitating students' learning processes’; and ‘fostering an effective learning climate’ as the ‘four key challenges to the design of the blend’ in a blended learning…”
• Rediscovering the use of chatbots in education: A systematic literature review (2020, methodology): “Boelens et al. [ 9] or Van Laar et al. [69] are another examples of the use of PRISMA framework.”
• An examination of teachers’ strategies to foster student engagement in blended learning in higher education (2021, background): “Nevertheless, teachers play a central role in BL, from course design to facilitation of interactions and support of students’ learning processes (Boelens et al., 2017; McGee & Reis, 2012).”