Core self‐evaluations: a review of the trait and its role in job satisfaction and job performance
586 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/37bd657d1c9428e97eac7869cfd1607a6f51879f
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
- Arnold B. Bakker
- Wilmar B. Schaufeli
- Evangelia Demerouti
- Russell E. Johnson
- Osman M. Karatepe
- Amanda Shantz
- Kenneth J. Harris
- Gene M. Alarcon
In Social Psychology
- Arnold B. Bakker
- Wilmar B. Schaufeli
- Evangelia Demerouti
- Amanda Shantz
- Russell E. Johnson
- N. Bowling
- Osman M. Karatepe
- Toon W. Taris
In Sociology and Political Science
- Arnold B. Bakker
- Wilmar B. Schaufeli
- Kenneth J. Harris
- Evangelia Demerouti
- Russell E. Johnson
- Osman M. Karatepe
- Gene M. Alarcon
- Christopher C. Rosen
Citations in the corpus
- Positive organizational behavior: Engaged employees in flourishing organizations (2008, methodology): “A similar synthesizing approach was used by Bono and Judge (2003), who integrated neuroticism, self-esteem and locus of control into a higher-order construct the so-called ‘‘core self-evaluation.’’”
- The effects of core self‐evaluations and transformational leadership on organizational commitment (2012, background): “Core self-evaluations are originally conceptualized as an explanatory variable of job satisfaction (Bono and Judge, 2003; Judge et al., 1998).”
- Do Social Stressors Impact Everyone Equally? An Examination of the Moderating Impact of Core Self-evaluations (2009, background): “ Bono and Judge (2003) explained that higher core self-evaluations help individuals perceive their jobs in a positive light, causing them to focus on the desirable characteristics of the jobs.”
- A model of “substance” and “evaluation” in person judgments (2015, background): “A person’s overall selfevaluations may range from very negative to very positive (Bono & Judge, 2003; Furr & Funder, 1998; Judge, Erez, Bono, & Thoresen, 2002; Leising et al., 2013), and the evaluative tones of items should determine the extent to which such differences influence the person’s…”
- Turnover intention: the effects of core self-evaluations, proactive personality, perceived organizational support, developmental feedback, and job complexity (2015, background): “A number of investigations have suggested a positive relationship between core self-evaluations and job satisfaction (e.g. Bono and Judge 2003; Judge et al. 2005; Wu and Griffin 2012).”
- Fuzzy Profiles (2018, background): “…have also sought to better understand the overall meaning of CSE, with some suggesting that it may simply reflect a broader conceptualization of emotional stability (Bono & Judge, 2003), self-esteem (Johnson et al., 2008), or approach/avoidance motivation (Ferris et al., 2011; Ferris et al., 2013).”
- Core Self-Evaluations in Germany: Validation of a German Measure and its Relationships with Career Success (2010, methodology): “Research has shown that the core self-evaluations construct is related to job satisfaction and performance (Bono & Judge, 2003) as well as other vocational criteria such as health (Best, Stapleton, & Downey, 2005), responses to feedback (Bono & Colbert, 2005), customer service (Salvaggio,…”
- How transformational leadership predicts employees’ affective commitment and performance (2018, background): “Research has traditionally tested employees’ performance as a criterion variable (Bono and Judge, 2003; Quiñones et al., 1995).”
- Core Self-Evaluations and Work Success (2009, background): “Some of this relative misfit appears to be due to problems in measuring locus of control (see Bono & Judge, 2003 ).”