Cross-Cultural Research Methods

By C. Ember, M. Ember. 2000

1,070 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/362406ac2c06d2772545ae5e9efa95748596119b

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Social Psychology

1. Arménio Rego
2. Miguel Pina e Cunha
3. Wendy Wood
4. A. Eagly
5. Tatiana Ryba
6. R. Schinke
7. N. Stambulova
8. Carla Susana Marques

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Wendy Wood
2. A. Eagly
3. Anna S. Mattila
4. Xuehua Wang
5. Zhilin Yang
6. Lei Vincent Huang
7. N. Stambulova
8. Muhammad Rasyid Abdillah

Citations in the corpus

• Measurement Equivalence Of 10 Value Types From The Schwartz Value Survey Across 21 Countries (2003, background): “different countries were urged to make a double translation of the material (see Brislin, Lonner, & Thorndike, 1973 ).”
• Expatriate learning: exploring how Japanese managers adapt in the United States (2006, methodology): “Translation procedures Brislin et al. (1973) recommended three techniques to translate psychometric instruments to achieve the equivalence of the original versions.”
• Methodological Issues in Cross-Cultural Counseling Research (2008, methodology): “Brislin and colleagues (Brislin, 1976, 1983; Brislin et al., 1973) suggested a combined etic–emic strategy.”
• Culture, Stress, and Coping (2004, methodology): “As in Study 1, materials were translated and back translated as suggested by Brislin et al. (1973).”
• Psychological capital and performance of Portuguese civil servants: exploring neutralizers in the context of an appraisal system (2010, background): “Consultation and discussion with three organizational members were also carried out (Brislin, Lonner and Thorndike 1973 ).”
• Challenges to the Study of African American Parenting: Conceptualization, Sampling, Research Approaches, Measurement, and Design (2008, background): “The distinction between emic and etic paradigms ( Brislin, Lonner, & Thorndike, 1973 ) is relevant to the development, selection, or adaptation of instruments to measure parenting in African Americans.”
• The Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire: Psychometric Properties of the Chinese Version (2011, methodology): “As suggested by Ember and Ember (2001) , we first translated the items of the FFMQ into Chinese and then back-translated them into English.”
• Developing a pragmatics test for Chinese EFL learners (2007, methodology): “The equivalence of the two versions was checked by means of back translation – that is, the situations were translated into Chinese first, and then back to English by another translator (Brislin et al., 1973; Fowler, 1993; Kasper and Rose, 2002; Sinaiko and Brislin, 1973).”
• Factors contributing to the quality of the transition out of elite sports in Swiss, Danish, and Polish athletes (2017, neutral): “Consequently, regression techniques are recommended for crosscultural studies, as they are considered less sensitive to cultural bias than the comparison of means across samples taken from different contexts (Ember & Ember, 2009).”