Measurement Equivalence Of 10 Value Types From The Schwartz Value Survey Across 21 Countries

By D. Spini. 2003

249 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/8737dcef00d6fae668105caef08adf88e38d2df8

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Social Psychology

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

Personal values and prosocial behaviour in strategic interactions: Distinguishing value‐expressive from value‐ambivalent behaviours (2013, background): “…that can be found across a very wide range of cultures (for empirical evidence regarding the cross-cultural robustness of the theory, see, for instance, Davidov, Schmidt, & Schwartz, 2008; Schwartz & Boehnke, 2004; Schwartz & Rubel, 2005; Spini, 2003; Vauclair, Hanke, Fischer, & Fontaine, 2011).”
A comparison of the invariance properties of the PVQ-40 and the PVQ-21 to measure human values across German and Polish Samples (2012, methodology): “For example, Spini (2003) tested measurement invariance of the Schwartz Value Survey for each of the 10 value types separately.”
The structure of goal contents across 15 cultures. (2005, background): “10 9 The hypothesis of equivalent intercepts across numerous samples (e.g., more than 10) is difficult to reach, as found by Spini (2003) with Schwartz's (1992) values.”
Individual value structure and diversity attitudes: The moderating effects of age, gender, race, and religiosity (2005, methodology): “Values have been used as independent variables to understand attitude and behavior ( Spini, 2003”
Application of the scenario questionnaire of horizontal and vertical individualism and collectivism to the assessment of cultural distance and cultural fit (2005, unknown): “…various statistical techniques are used to ensure measurement equivalence of the scales and to draw conclusions about the cross-cultural comparability of constructs (Byrne & Watkins, 2003; Cheung & Rensvold, 2000; Ghorpade, Hattrup, & Lackritz, 1999; Spini, 2003; Steenkamp & Baumgartner, 1998).”
Analyzing observed composite differences across groups: Is partial measurement invariance enough? (2013, unknown): “Research shows that unequal intercepts are the rule rather than the exception (Baumgartner & Steenkamp, 1998; Davidov, 2008; König, Steinmetz, Frese, Rauch, & Wang, 2007; Spini, 2003; Steinmetz, 2010; Steinmetz, Schmidt, Tina-Booh, Schwartz, & Wieczorek, 2009).”
Reasons for Being Selective When Choosing Personnel Selection Procedures (2010, unknown): “…that the null hypothesis of invariance between the configural invariance model and the equivalence analyses with (ΔCFI = .007) and without the AC data (ΔCFI = .001). e An alternative way of dealing with a Heywood case (e.g., Spini, 2003) is to exclude the sample in which the Heywood case appeared.”
A Twenty-First Century Assessment of Values Across the Global Workforce (2011, background): “In addition, our findings indicate substantial cross-national variation in the internal consistency of the self-direction and security measures, and that the hedonism measure, in both its two- and three-item forms, is a generally unreliable measure (Spini 2003).”
Structural Equivalence of the Values Domain Across Cultures (2008, background): “Spini (2003) examined the measurement properties of each of the 10 values separately, taking the overall value structure for granted.”
Values and their Relationship to Environmental Concern and Conservation Behavior (2005, background): “Schwartz’s values items are considered to be universal across cultures, and previous research has demonstrated a fair degree of equivalence across many diverse samples (cf. Spini, 2003).”
A Study of the Relationship Between Personal Values and Moral Reasoning of Undergraduate Business Students (2008, methodology): “Schwartz s theory of basic human values identifies fiftysix values that cluster into 10 motivationally distinct value types (Spini, 2003).”