The relationship between innovation and business performance—a comparative study between manufacturing and service firms

By Daniel I. Prajogo. 2006

221 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Marketing, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/3462609fd4d2ccd5af6e4b6c2c3848ac2f25b759

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

In Marketing

In Strategy and Management

Citations in the corpus

Effects of innovation types on firm performance: An empirical study on Pakistan's manufacturing sector (2013, background): “As Prajogo (2006) found that innovation in manufacturing industry is more radical and has a stronger impact on performance than that in service sector, therefore this research is conducted in manufacturing sector.”
Commitment-based HR practices, different types of innovation activities and firm innovation performance (2013, background): “Langerak, Hultink and Robben 2004 ; Prajogo 2006 ; Wolff and Pett 2006 ).”
Dual embeddedness, influence and performance of innovating subsidiaries in the multinational corporation (2014, background): “Consequently, innovation-related business performance is typically measured in terms of sales growth, market share, and profitability (Prajogo, 2006; Prajogo & Ahmed, 2007).”
Service innovation and performance in SMEs (2012, background): “It is not surprising, therefore, that manufacturing firms have been found to draw larger benefits from various aspects of innovation compared to service firms, except in terms of the number of new products/services introduced to the market (Prajogo, 2006).”
The Role of Networks in Small and Medium‐Sized Enterprise Innovation and Firm Performance (2012, background): “This relationship has been well established in numerous studies over the past decades, showing that innovation activities and output are important correlates or determinants of firm performance (Baldwin and Gellatly 2003; Crepon, Duguet, and Mairesse 1998; Damanpour and Evan 1984; Gopalakrishnan 200”
Customer orientation and innovation : a comparative study of manufacturing and service firms (2016, result): “The mix of similarities and differences between manufacturing and service firms echoes the results of previous studies that compared innovation in the service and manufacturing industries (Ettlie and Rosenthal, 2011; Prajogo, 2006; Song et al., 1999).”
Customer involvement capability and service firm performance: The mediating role of innovation (2017, methodology): “Innovation in service was assessed with two different types of innovation that have been widely used in service research: product innovation and process innovation (see Anning-Dorson, 2016a; Prajogo, 2006; Sundbo, 2003; Sundbo, Orfila-Sintes, & Sørensen, 2007).”
Success Factors for Service Innovation: A Meta‐Analysis (2016, background): “Often, competitors copy new services quickly, easily, and cheaply; unlike innovative products, which may gain years of protection via patents, proprietary technology, or simply the length of time it takes to do the development work (Prajogo, 2006).”