The mind in the middle: A practical guide to priming and automaticity research.

By John A. Bargh, T. Chartrand. 2000

1,613 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/32b2878c1c9b0f122f0bc448d5663ad75ade1d40

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

The True Self and Psychological Health: Emerging Evidence and Future Directions (2011, methodology): “Across five studies, we then either utilized reaction times on a Me ⁄Not Me task to measure cognitive accessibility or priming techniques to manipulate the cognitive accessibility of one’s true self-concept (e.g., Bargh & Chartrand, 2000).”
Consumer Inference: A Review of Processes, Bases, and Judgment Contexts (2004, methodology): “To avoid measurement-induced inference formation, sophisticated indirect methods and measures are needed (e.g., recall measures of memory intrusions, recognition confidence measures of source confusion, response latency procedures; see Bargh & Chartrand, 2000; Fazio, 1990).”
Fighting self-control failure: Overcoming ego depletion by increasing self-awareness (2011, methodology): “We chose for a SST because it is an implicit priming technique that minimizes demand characteristics or other self-presentational concerns (Bargh & Chartrand, 2000).”
Dogs on the Street, Pumas on Your Feet: How Cues in the Environment Influence Product Evaluation and Choice (2008, methodology): “In line with Bargh and Chartrand (2000), the debriefing task asked them to speculate on the purposes of the two studies, whether the two studies were connected, whether their response to the second was affected by the first, and, if so, how.”
You focus on the forest when you're in charge of the trees: power priming and abstract information processing. (2006, methodology): “Participants first completed a scrambled sentences task ( Bargh & Chartrand, 2000 ) to prime high power, low power, or nothing (control condition).”
On the Psychology of Scarcity: When Reminders of Resource Scarcity Promote Selfish (and Generous) Behavior (2015, methodology): “To reduce the impact of outliers, reaction times were then subjected to a natural log transformation, and reaction times exceeding three standard deviations from their cell mean were eliminated from the analysis, following prior work (Bargh and Chartrand 2000; Fazio 1990).”
The social media political participation model: A goal systems theory perspective (2020, background): “Extensive conscious processing of a stimulus can lead to stronger activation of related knowledge when compared to peripheral conscious processing or unconscious processing (Bargh and Chartrand, 2000; Petty and Cacioppo, 1986).”
Material priming: The influence of mundane physical objects on situational construal and competitive behavioral choice (2004, methodology): “After the participants completed their two tasks, they were debriefed with regard to their awareness or suspicion of the manipulation and/or purposes of the study according to a standardized funneled debriefing procedure (see Bargh & Chartrand, 2000), thanked for their participation, and excused.”
Priming Effects of Television Food Advertising on Eating Behavior (2009, unknown): “Finally, the first experimenter conducted a funnel debriefing (Bargh & Chartrand, 2000) to probe for awareness of the experimental hypotheses and effect of the advertisements on subsequent eating behavior.”
Unraveling Priming: When Does the Same Prime Activate a Goal versus a Trait? (2009, background): “The next part of the study was a seemingly unrelated lexical decision task that constituted the subliminal priming manipulation (Bargh and Chartrand 2000).”
Nonconscious motivations: Their activation, operation, and consequences. (2002, background): “This “primed” participants with one of the two goals, without their knowledge that any goal had been activated (see also Bargh & Chartrand, 2000; Sruil & Wyer, 1979).”
A cultural task analysis of implicit independence: comparing North America, Western Europe, and East Asia. (2009, unknown): “…that has attracted considerable research attention in recent years as an explanation of cultural differences in psychological processes highlights the notion of knowledge activation (Oyserman & Lee, 2007, 2008; for reviews, see also, e.g., Bargh, 2006; Bargh & Chartrand, 2000; Higgins, 1996).”
Individual differences in working memory capacity and dual-process theories of the mind. (2004, background): “Recent theorizing suggests that both are very likely triggered by environmental stimuli (Bargh & Ferguson, 2000).”
The role of automaticity in determining the inclination to forgive close others (2007, methodology): “Thus, if eVects on the forgiveness responses occur they seem to operate outside of participants’ conscious awareness (Bargh & Chartrand, 2000).”