The role of automaticity in determining the inclination to forgive close others

By J. Karremans, Henk Aarts. 2007

95 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ee2c2c63c3bc9a2a3323f41f45e6b91410d2a14a

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Clinical Psychology

1. Phillip R. Shaver
2. Mario Mikulincer
3. J. Cassidy
4. J. Stern
5. Jacquelyn T. Gross
6. Yelena Tsarenko
7. Meifen Wei
8. Omri Gillath

In Social Psychology

1. Phillip R. Shaver
2. Mario Mikulincer
3. J. Cassidy
4. J. Stern
5. Jacquelyn T. Gross
6. Dewi Rooslani Tojib
7. Yelena Tsarenko
8. Omri Gillath

Citations in the corpus

• A transactional model of forgiveness in the service failure context: a customer‐driven approach (2011, background): “There is a general consensus that forgiveness is a process rather than an act, that evolves over time; most importantly, forgiveness is regarded as an intended, deliberate activity and not merely as the dissipation of negative emotions and feelings (McCullough et al., 2003; Karremans and Aarts, 2007”
• A lifespan perspective on attachment and care for others: Empathy, altruism, and prosocial behavior (2016, background): “Karremans and Aarts (2007) found that security priming (with the name of a loving other) elicited more automatic forgiving responses to interpersonal offenses than neutral priming.”