Multiple Measures and High‐Stakes Decisions: A Framework for Combining Measures

By Michael Chester. 2005

64 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Education, Information Systems and Management, Management Science and Operations Research

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/32588423d9b54b86213caa03fe484a5e2640ec09

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Education

1. Durdona Ruxullayevna Nikadambayeva
2. Theo J. Bastiaens
3. Paul A. Kirschner
4. S. Peters
5. C. V. D. van der Vleuten
6. Craig Waterman
7. Matthew T. McBee
8. J. Papay

In Information Systems and Management

1. Paul A. Kirschner
2. Durdona Ruxullayevna Nikadambayeva
3. Craig Waterman
4. C. V. D. van der Vleuten
5. Theo J. Bastiaens
6. Matthew T. McBee
7. S. Peters
8. J. Papay

In Management Science and Operations Research

1. Paul A. Kirschner
2. Durdona Ruxullayevna Nikadambayeva
3. Craig Waterman
4. C. V. D. van der Vleuten
5. Theo J. Bastiaens
6. Matthew T. McBee
7. S. Peters
8. J. Papay

Citations in the corpus

• Evaluating assessment quality in competence-based education: A qualitative comparison of two frameworks (2007, methodology): “This article uses the definition given by Eraut et al. (1998), as it incorporated these two aspects.”
• Different Tests, Different Answers (2011, background): “In a recent special issue of Educational Measurement on multiple measures, Chester (2003) agreed, arguing that the methods for combining the measures determine the reliability and validity of any decisions based on them.”
• Combining Scores in Multiple-Criteria Assessment Systems (2014, methodology): “Multiple measures can be combined in a variety of ways (Chester, 2003).”