Enabling Knowledge Creation
By Georgvon Krogh, K. Ichijo, Ikujiro Nonaka. 2000
1,396 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Communication, Computer Science Applications, Developmental and Educational Psychology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/3256ca2e83feb72bf793311067e548e6a137c050
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Communication
- Georgvon Krogh
- Kurt Matzler
- Todd A. Mooradian
- Birgit Renzl
- Young-Gul Kim
- Eric von Hippel
- Torben Pedersen
- Alfredo Virgillito
In Computer Science Applications
- Georgvon Krogh
- Kurt Matzler
- Eric von Hippel
- Birgit Renzl
- Alfredo Virgillito
- Uwe Wilkesmann
- Young-Gul Kim
- Paul R. Carlile
In Developmental and Educational Psychology
- Georgvon Krogh
- R. Duane Ireland
- Torben Pedersen
- Birgit Renzl
- Eric von Hippel
- Kurt Matzler
- Shaker A. Zahra
- Ikujiro Nonaka
Citations in the corpus
- A Dialogical Approach to the Creation of New Knowledge in Organizations (2009, background): “Organizational members can articulate better what they want by interacting with artifacts, such as prototypes and visual aids, than by enumerating requirements or verbalizing needs (Bechky 2003b, p. 324; Leonard-Barton 1995, pp. 127–133; von Krogh et al. 2000, pp. 89–90; Schrage 2000, p. 166).”
- Emerging Issues in Corporate Entrepreneurship (2003, background): “In this context, CE is a knowledge enabler as it forms and subsequently uses or applies knowledge (von Grogh et al., 2000)—knowledge that at its best, is valuable, new, unique, and competitively relevant (Zahra et al., 1999).”
- The Absence of Cooperation Is Not Necessarily Defection: Structural and Motivational Constraints of Knowledge Transfer in a Social Dilemma Situation (2009, background): “In the literature about knowledge management, this phenomenon is referred to as ‘microcommunities of knowledge’ (von Krogh et al. 2000: 14) or as communities of practice (Wenger et al. 2002).”
- Free revealing and the private-collective model for innovation incentives (2006, background): “Manufacturers may then improve upon it and/or, assuming economies of scale in production, offer it at a price lower than users’ inhouse production costs (Kotha, 1995; von Krogh et al., 2000; Harhoff et al., 2003).”
- Knowledge transfer capacity and its implications for the theory of the multinational corporation (2003, background): “For example, firms have more success in transferring their technology outward if they have a formal, dedicated ‘knowledge and technology transfer unit’ in place (Von Krogh et al., 2000).”
- The impact of knowledge management on MNC subsidiary performance: the role of absorptive capacity (2005, background): “As suggested by much research on knowledge management (see Argote, 1999; Krogh et al, 2000 for a synthesis) learning systems need to provide access to other MNC unit’s knowledge.”
- Re-conceiving Change Management:: A Knowledge-based Perspective (2003, background): “An enabling context requires employees to use knowledge of other employees, to create useful contacts, ask for help and ideas, and to share with and learn from each other (Von Krogh et al, 2000).”
- An Empirical Investigation of the Process of Knowledge Transfer in International Strategic Alliances (2004, background): “In fact, Von Krogh et al. (2000) insist that a proper knowledge vision must specify what knowledge organizational members need to seek and create.”
- Community, Joining, and Specialization in Open Source Software Innovation: A Case Study (2003, neutral): “von Krogh et al. / Research Policy 32 (2003) 1217–1241”
- A Pragmatic View of Knowledge and Boundaries: Boundary Objects in New Product Development (2002, background): “The difficulty of transferring knowledge (Suzlanski 1996), the tacit nature of knowledge (Polanyi 1966, Nonaka 1994, von Krogh et al. 2000), and its stickiness (von Hippel and Tyre 1996) have been important revelations into why knowledge is difficult to “manage.””