An Empirical Investigation of the Process of Knowledge Transfer in International Strategic Alliances
By B. Simonin. 2004
660 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Communication, Strategy and Management
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a813d7fd2ad7934bea929055ed14947d04057891
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Communication
- Markus Pudelko
- Bjoern Sebastian Reiche
- Xu Jiang
- Yuan Li
- Ramón Valle-Cabrera
- Elena Sousa‐Ginel
- Mark Easterby-Smith
- C. Camelo‐Ordaz
In Strategy and Management
- Markus Pudelko
- Bjoern Sebastian Reiche
- Pervez Ghauri
- Xu Jiang
- Rudolf R. Sinkovics
- Brian L. Connelly
- Marjorie A. Lyles
- Anne-Wil Harzing
Citations in the corpus
- Founding conditions and the survival of new firms (2009, background): “Tacit knowledge is more difficult to transfer than explicit knowledge, and the higher the qualifications of labor the greater the complexity and tacitness of the knowledge it embodies (Simonin 2004).”
- Absorptive Capacity and Firm Performance in SMEs: The Mediating Influence of Strategic Alliances (2011, background): “, Todeva and Knoke, 2005), and by examining which core competences and resources are essential for a successful implementation of alliances (e.g., Dyer et al., 2001; Simonin, 2004).”
- Exploitative and exploratory innovations in emerging economies: The role of realized absorptive capacity and learning intent (2019, methodology): “Existing studies on alliances and learning highlight the key role of recipient firms’ learning intent in the knowledge transfer process (e.g., Hamel, 1991; Simonin, 2004).”
- Inter-Organizational Knowledge Transfer: Current Themes and Future Prospects (2008, background): “Szulanski’s (1996) study has shown that this process can be difficult and should not be taken for granted.”
- The relationship between organizational learning and firms’ financial performance in strategic alliances: A contingency approach (2008, background): “If a firm aims to acquire valuable knowledge from its partners, it must simultaneously have both learning intent and learning capability (Simonin, 2004).”
- Why and how does shared language affect subsidiary knowledge inflows? A social identity perspective (2015, background): “Thus far, scholars have mainly adopted the knowledge-based view of the firm (e.g., Fang et al., 2010; Yang et al., 2008), with notable other work drawing from additional perspectives such as social capital theory (e.g., Tsai & Ghoshal, 1998) and organizational learning theory (e.g., Simonin, 2004).”
- New perspectives on learning and innovation in cross-sector collaborations (2012, neutral): “The alliance literature has extensively applied this concept to explain inter-partner learning dynamics (e.g., Lane & Lubatkin, 1998; Simonin, 2004, among many others).”
- Repatriating knowledge: variables influencing the “transfer” process (2009, background): “Simonin (2004) states that readiness and receptivity to transfer knowledge have both a cognitive (i.e., attitudes, orientations, perspectives) and a motivational aspect.”