Challenges of open innovation: the paradox of firm investment in open‐source software
By Joel West, Scott R. Gallagher. 2006
1,039 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Accounting, Computer Science Applications, Strategy and Management
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/30f7d3789b6c1312520a2381bdda65037d446053
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Accounting
- Joel West
- Linus Dahlander
- H. Chesbrough
- Marcel Bogers
- S. Roper
- Lars Frode Frederiksen
- Satish Nambisan
- Stefan Haefliger
In Computer Science Applications
- Marcel Bogers
- Joel West
- H. Chesbrough
- Satish Nambisan
- Linus Dahlander
- Sabine Brunswicker
- S. Roper
- David M. Gann
In Strategy and Management
- Marcel Bogers
- Joel West
- H. Chesbrough
- Satish Nambisan
- Linus Dahlander
- David M. Gann
- Agnieszka Radziwon
- S. Roper
Citations in the corpus
- TOWARD A DYNAMIC PERSPECTIVE ON OPEN INNOVATION: A LONGITUDINAL ASSESSMENT OF THE (2009, neutral): “, 2006), investing in open-source software (West and Gallagher, 2006), integrating external technology exploitation in strategic technology-planning processes (Lichtenthaler, 2008), and managing alliances and partnerships (Chiaromonte, 2006; Faems et al.”
- The role of absorptive capacity in facilitating "open innovation" outcomes: A study of Australian SMEs in the manufacturing sector (2009, positive): “Other literature has compared open innovation’s benefits in negating the inwardly-focused culture of closed innovation and also extending the potential of vertical and horizontal integration (West and Gallagher, 2006).”
- Opening Up for Competitive Advantage – How Deutsche Telekom Creates an Open Innovation Ecosystem (2009, neutral): “open innovation and how the individual employee can be stimulated to participate in an open innovation process (Henkel, 2006; West and Gallagher, 2006).”
- Innovation intermediaries and collaboration: Knowledge–based practices and internal value creation (2018, positive): “…through shaping the interests of actors within an innovation system to increase the chances of reaching a shared understanding and mutuality between the participating actors which is important for successful collaboration (West and Gallagher, 2006; Wallin and von Krogh, 2010; Tjong et al., 2015).”
- Smart tourism: foundations and developments (2015, neutral): “Open innovation is based on the assumption that an organisation cannot just rely on its own resources, but has to engage with partners in order to innovate (Dahlander and Gann 2010; West and Gallagher 2006).”
- The dark side of knowledge transfer: Exploring knowledge leakage in joint R&D projects (2015, neutral): “Prugl and Schreier (2006) find that information asymmetry may mitigate or offset these risks, whereas West and Gallagher (2006) suggest that lack of control and governance may exacerbate them.”
- How open is innovation (2010, positive): “This contention is highlighted in the existence of phenomena such as Wikipedia and free and open source software where individuals collectively develop innovative solutions (West and Gallagher, 2006).”
- Distributed Tuning of Boundary Resources: The Case of Apple's iOS Service System (2015, neutral): “…has lowered entry barriers to service systems, allowing various individual actors and small firms to participate in service systems and thereby facilitating an open and crowd-sourced innovation process (Chesbrough 2006; Lakhani and Von Hippel 2003; von Hippel 2005; West and Gallagher 2006).”
- Explicating Open Innovation: Clarifying an Emerging Paradigm for Understanding Innovation (2014, neutral): “Fleming and Waguespack (2007) Brokerage, boundary spanning, and leadership in open innovation communit ies Organization Science 56 West and Gallagher (2006) Challenges of open innovation: The paradox of firm investment in opensource software R&D Management 55 Jacobides, Knudsen, and…”
- The open innovation research landscape: established perspectives and emerging themes across different levels of analysis (2016, positive): “Such users are motivated to produce innovations because they enjoy the process of doing so (West and Gallagher 2006), can benefit from using the solution (Von Hippel 1982), or gain symbolic capital in the form of thanks and peer recognition (Berthon et al. 2007).”