Explicating Open Innovation: Clarifying an Emerging Paradigm for Understanding Innovation

By H. Chesbrough, Marcel Bogers. 2014

1,051 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/4731068272f0f807c80cdb4c9945ca1730e1336a

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

The Adoption of Open Innovation in Large Firms (2018, methodology): “…design, we drew upon the research on open innovation and enriched it with literature on coordination and knowledge sharing in interorganizational relationships (for instance, Chesbrough and Bogers 2014; Felin and Zenger 2014; Jarvenpaa and Majchrzak 2016; Kirsch 1996; Laursen and Salter 2006).”
Open innovation: a new classification and its impact on firm performance in innovative SMEs (2015, background): “…36 Although Enkel et al. (2009) suggested a ‘coupled process’ combining both in- and out-bound knowledge flows and Dahlander and Gann (2010) and Chesbrough and Bogers (2014) extended the coupled model definition, for the purpose of this analysis we concentrate on the main in- and out-bound…”
Open Innovation 4.0 as an Enhancer of Sustainable Innovation Ecosystems (2020, background): “Nearly a decade later, the framework was updated arguing that success of the process depends on the knowledge flows and that they should be carefully managed inside and outside the firm boundaries with straightforward mechanisms providing already-established solutions, accordingly to the business mo”
The evolution of intellectual property strategy in innovation ecosystems: Uncovering complementary and substitute appropriability regimes (2017, background): “Open innovation research explains how firms can rely on external technologies to augment their internal innovation development or how they can tap into external partners to exploit internally developed technologies (Chesbrough and Bogers, 2014).”
Open innovation: current status and research opportunities (2017, unknown): “Chesbrough and Bogers (2014) explored the growth, scope, and impact of OI research, and extended the definition of OI to include not-for-profit actors and motivations.”
Unravelling appropriability mechanisms and openness depth effects on firm performance across stages in the innovation process (2017, background): “A large body of literature emphasizes in recent years the utter importance of external knowledge search and efficient knowledge recombination in order to innovate (Chesbrough and Bogers, 2014;Mina et al., 2014; Martini et al., 2015).”
External knowledge search, absorptive capacity and radical innovation in high-technology firms (2017, background): “The concept of open innovation (OI) stresses the notion of leveraging external knowledge and has become increasingly popular both in academic research and industry practice (Chesbrough & Bogers, 2014).”
Value Creation and Value Capture in Open Innovation (2018, background): “Open innovation, defined as “a distributed innovation process based on purposively managed knowledge flows across organizational boundaries, using pecuniary and nonpecuniary mechanisms in line with the organization’s business model” (Chesbrough and Bogers, 2014), is a multiactor exchange process in ”
Open innovation in SMEs: Exploring inter-organizational relationships in an ecosystem (2017, background): “This is in line with inbound and outbound open innovation (Chesbrough and Bogers, 2014; Dahlander and Gann, 2010) and has important implications for dealing with the paradoxes of knowledge sharing/protection and appropriability (Bogers, 2011; Laursen and Salter, 2014).”