How open is innovation

By Linus Dahlander, David M. Gann. 2010

2,657 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Computer Science Applications, Management Information Systems, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/064fbd1df03eb452f51ec76a0ab3db94857427a3

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Computer Science Applications

In Management Information Systems

In Strategy and Management

Citations in the corpus

Antecedents, moderators, and outcomes of innovation climate and open innovation: An empirical study in SMEs (2017, background): “However, SMEs have comparatively less resources to screen the external environment for valuable information than their larger counterparts (Dahlander and Gann, 2010; Van de Please cite this article as: Popa, S., et al., Antecedents,moderators, and outco SMEs, Technol.”
Technology Acquisition in Family and Nonfamily Firms: A Longitudinal Analysis of Spanish Manufacturing Firms (2013, background): “Although external technology acquisition has been a critical component of firm’s technology strategy since the 1980s (Chatterji, 1996), the recent debate around open and collaborative innovation paradigms indicates that it still ranks very high on the agenda of R&D and product managers (Dahlander an”
Appropriation strategies and open innovation in SMEs (2016, background): “That is, if firms acquire and source from many places, but sell and reveal to only a few (Dahlander and Gann, 2010), then an asymmetry is likely to be apparent from the firm’s perspective.”
The digital transformation of innovation and entrepreneurship: Progress, challenges and key themes (2019, background): “Similarly, studies on open innovation have focused on the sharing and flow of knowledge and technological assets across organizational boundaries in pursuit of innovation and entrepreneurship (e.g., Chesbrough, 2003; Dahlander and Gann, 2010; West and Bogers, 2014).”
The Identification and Characterization of Open Innovation Profiles in Italian Small and Medium‐sized Enterprises (2015, background): “Numerous studies have demonstrated that enterprises adopting an open innovation (OI) strategy achieve best performances in terms of capacity to innovate (Ahuja 2000), innovative level of products/services (Dahlander and Gann 2010; Laursen and Salter 2006; Lichtenthaler 2008a), improvement of basic c”
Leveraging External Sources of Innovation: A Review of Research on Open Innovation (2014, positive): “However, more research is needed on the motivation of the external collaborator—particularly in cases where the collaboration is driven by nonpecuniary motivations (as highlighted by West and Gallagher, 2006, and Dahlander and Gann, 2010).”
Towards an integrated crowdsourcing definition (2012, background): “There are also authors who identify crowdsourcing as a process of organizing labour [46], as a client integration process [13] or as an open innovation process [27, 43], understanding open innovation as a paradigm that assumes firms can commercialize both their own ideas as well as innovations from ”
Leading innovation: Empirical evidence for ambidextrous leadership from UK high-tech SMEs (2020, background): “Although some researchers have suggested open innovation as an alternative approach for SMEs to achieve ambidexterity (Dahlander and Gann, 2010; Van de Vrande et al., 2009), limited research has been carried out on the sustainability of such pursuits.”
Architectural leverage: putting platforms in context (2014, methodology): “Each downloaded paper was read and coded to identify broad usages of the term, definitions, academic tradition, type of research, implied theory, value conditions and key concepts, as well as to track interrelationships between each of the usages and concepts (Dahlander & Gann, 2010).”
Business models for open innovation: Matching heterogeneous open innovation strategies with business model dimensions (2015, background): “Open innovation has been widely debated in the management of innovation literature over the past decade (e.g., Chesbrough, 2003; Dahlander & Gann, 2010; Gassmann & Enkel, 2004; von Hippel, 2005; Prahalad & Ramaswary, 2004; West & Gallagher, 2006).”
A Fad or a Phenomenon?: The Adoption of Open Innovation Practices in Large Firms (2014, background): “This may occur when fi rms can access freely revealed knowledge, for instance, knowledge shared via donations or as part of a standards setting process ( Dahlander and Gann 2010 ).”
Open innovation practices in SMEs and large enterprises (2012, positive): “These OI practices are highly relevant for SMEs since they struggle with the liability of smallness, facing resource constraints and scale limitations and having fewer technological assets to bargain with (Narula 2004; Dahlander and Gann 2010; Chesbrough 2011).”