An Intentions–Based Model of Entrepreneurial Teams’ Social Cognition*

By Dean A. Shepherd, Norris Krueger. 2002

281 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Management of Technology and Innovation, Safety Research

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/2a82b3b5922704c82a41aefbe83fe534a61d97cc

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

In Management of Technology and Innovation

In Safety Research

Citations in the corpus

The Cognitive Perspective in Entrepreneurship: An Agenda for Future Research (2011, unknown): “Moving beyond the level of individual phenomena, we noted that few studies explored the link between team cognition and entrepreneurial firm performance (e.g. Ensley and Hmieleski, 2005; Ensley and Pearce, 2001; Shepherd and Krueger, 2002; West, 2007).”
Personality traits and theory of planned behavior comparison of entrepreneurial intentions between an emerging economy and a developing country (2019, background): “There is also an indirect link between personality variables and entrepreneurial action, mediated by several factors, including attitude and intention (Shepherd and Krueger, 2002).”
Social Entrepreneurial Intention Formation of Corporate Volunteers (2013, background): “Research on collective efficacy is less developed than that on self-efficacy but is nonetheless telling in this domain (Shepherd and Krueger 2002).”
Collective Cognition: When Entrepreneurial Teams, Not Individuals, Make Decisions (2007, background): “Shepherd and Krueger (2002) researched intentions and desirability with respect to engaging in corporate entrepreneurship, while Ensley and Pearce (2001) included a “shared cognition” variable in a study relating group process to new venture performance.”
Choosing Qualitative Methods for Entrepreneurial Cognition Research: A Canonical Development Approach (2004, unknown): “…most prominent and sustained body of work in the subfield of entrepreneurial intentions (Krueger Jr., 2003; Krueger, 1993, Krueger & Dickson, 1994, Krueger, 2000; Krueger & Brazeal, 1994; Krueger & Carsrud, 1993; Krueger & Dickson, 1993; Krueger, Reilly, & Carsrud, 2000; Shepherd & Krueger, 2002).”
The Conflicting Cognitions of Corporate Entrepreneurs (2007, unknown): “…interaction within the process of entrepreneurship research, with the exception of a few (e.g., Ensley, Pearce, & Hmieleski, in press; Shepherd & Krueger, 2002; Simon & Houghton 2002), the large majority of studies today that focus on the individual give less regard to contextual…”
Learning asymmetries and the discovery of entrepreneurial opportunities (2007, background): “Knowledge (Ardichvili et al., 2003), expert scripts (Mitchell et al., 2000), alertness (Gaglio and Katz, 2001), intentions (Shepherd and Krueger, 2002), cognitive mechanisms (Baron, 1998), and cognitive infrastructure (Krueger, 2000) are just a handful of the important triggers that have been…”
A situated metacognitive model of the entrepreneurial mindset (2010, background): “…scholars have returned to their psychological roots to focus on cognitive processes of the entrepreneur (Baron,1998; Mitchell et al., 2002a; Shepherd and Krueger, 2002), and have argued that cognition represents an important process lens through which to “reexamine the people side of…”
A Measure of Adaptive Cognition for Entrepreneurship Research (2009, background): “Recently, however, entrepreneurship scholars have returned to their psychological roots to focus on cognitive processes of the entrepreneur (Baron, 1998; Mitchell, Smith et al., 2002; Shepherd & Krueger, 2002).”