Choosing Qualitative Methods for Entrepreneurial Cognition Research: A Canonical Development Approach

By K. Hindle. 2004

196 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Management of Technology and Innovation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/03d725cce781f18e948f5221c7c13bea42abe9ec

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

1. Nick Williams
2. Christine Volkmann
3. S. P. Saßmannshausen
4. Tim Vorley

In Management of Technology and Innovation

1. Nick Williams
2. José F. Molina-Azorín
3. Eva M. Pertusa-Ortega
4. Christine Volkmann
5. S. P. Saßmannshausen
6. Tim Vorley
7. Ilan Alon
8. Vanessa P. G. Bretas

Citations in the corpus

• Institutional asymmetry: How formal and informal institutions affect entrepreneurship in Bulgaria (2015, background): “Although entrepreneurship research has been dominated by quantitative approaches, there is a growing body of qualitative research that provides deep insights into the entrepreneur and the entrepreneurial environment (Hindle, 2004).”
• Mixed methods studies in entrepreneurship research: Applications and contributions (2012, background): “In any case, Gartner and Birley ( 2002 ) and Hindle ( 2004 ) emphasized the need for greater use of qualitative methods, pointing out that many of the important questions in entrepreneurship can only be addressed through qualitative approaches.”
• The Scientometrics of Social Entrepreneurship and Its Establishment as an Academic Field1 (2018, background): “There is no doubt that narratives and other forms of qualitative research are important tools to enhance our understanding of the field (Gartner 2007; Gartner and Birley 2002; Hindle 2004; Neergard and Ulhøi 2007), when applied properly.”