The Conflicting Cognitions of Corporate Entrepreneurs

By Andrew C. Corbett, Keith M. Hmieleski. 2007

145 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Management of Technology and Innovation, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/17b47b868b5ae1592fc071dfb32e5020509a45b6

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Management of Technology and Innovation

In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

In Strategy and Management

Citations in the corpus

The Importance of Being Emotional : How do Emotions Affect Entrepreneurial Opportunity Evaluation and Exploitation? (2010, background): “However, the theoretical and empirical research has been fragmented and limited (Brundin et al., 2008; Cardon et al., 2009; Corbett, 2007; Corbett and Hmieleski, 2007).”
In the Eye of the Beholder: How Regulatory Focus and Self-Efficacy Interact in Influencing Opportunity Recognition (2011, unknown): “Thus, individuals could be trained to pay attention to such cues in order to produce problem solutions of higher quality and greater novelty (Brockner et al., 2004; Corbett and Hmieleski, 2007).”
Corporate Entrepreneurship: State‐of‐the‐Art Research and a Future Research Agenda (2013, background): “Attempting to develop new ventures in large existing organizations is fundamentally different than in " independent " start-ups, as individuals in corporate contexts are encumbered by a host of issues (Corbett and Hmieleski, 2007).”
Corporate entrepreneurship: the innovative challenge for a new global economic reality (2015, background): “Examples include: cognitive processes of corporate entrepreneurs (Corbett and Hmieleski 2007); the role of”
Revitalizing Entrepreneurship: The Search for New Research Opportunities (2011, unknown): “Accordingly, research on both aspects – the individual cognition and decision-making approach versus the context and role perspective – will help to decipher what determines the differences in entrepreneurial decision-making (Corbett and Hmieleski, 2007).”
Knowledge Internalization and Product Development in Family Firms: When Relational and Affective Factors Matter (2016, background): “Apparently, the detrimental impact of conflicts on knowledge processes may be exacerbated as later family generations assume control of the family firm, due to the greater complexity of social interactions among family members (Corbett & Hmieleski, 2007; Gersick et al., 1997).”
Perceived progress variability and entrepreneurial effort intensity: The moderating role of venture goal commitment (2015, background): “(Corbett and Hmieleski, 2007; McMullen and Shepherd, 2002), we predict that the experience of favorable perceived progress which represents a small win would encourage more effort intensity.”
When does entrepreneurial self-efficacy enhance versus reduce firm performance? (2008, background): “In such settings, comprehensive and cautious decision making might not be possible, and biases and heuristics may offer a useful alternative to formulated planning ( Corbett and Hmieleski, 2007 ).”
Storm Clouds and Silver Linings: Responding to Disruptive Innovations Through Cognitive Resilience (2010, background): “Entrepreneurship researchers emphasize that cognitive framing may differ between entrepreneurial and corporate settings (Corbett & Hmieleski, 2007).”
Innovativeness in family firms: a family influence perspective (2010, background): “When faced with risky opportunities, ‘‘people tend to act differently when they have assets to protect’’ ( Corbett and Hmieleski 2007, p. 106 ).”