Opportunities to Learn Reasoning and Proof in High School Mathematics Textbooks
By Denisse R. Thompson, S. Senk, G. Johnson. 2012
153 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Education, Statistics and Probability
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/26f8df2fc08d45bab40b091985715e8a533e29dd
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Education
- T. Fujita
- Keith Jones
- Johan Lithner
- Nicholas J. Gilbertson
- Samuel Otten
- Eva Jablonka
- Harpreet Kaur
- R. Leikin
In Statistics and Probability
Citations in the corpus
- Principles for designing mathematical tasks that enhance imitative and creative reasoning (2017, background): “and test tasks can be solved by imitating such templates (Lithner 2004; Stacey and Vincent 2009; Thompson et al. 2012; Bergqvist and Lithner 2012; Shield and Dole 2013; Boesen et al. 2014).”
- The Mathematical Nature of Reasoning-and-Proving Opportunities in Geometry Textbooks (2014, methodology): “geometry textbooks, this study complements the work that has already been done outside of geometry (Davis, 2010; Stylianides, 2009; Thompson et al., 2012).”
- Reasoning-and-proving in geometry in school mathematics textbooks in Japan (2014, methodology): “In order to provide an in-depth focus on RP, we augment an element of the TIMMS framework through using a conceptualisation of RP informed by work of Stylianides (2009) and of Thompson et al. (2012).”