The Mathematical Nature of Reasoning-and-Proving Opportunities in Geometry Textbooks

By Samuel Otten, Nicholas J. Gilbertson. 2014

77 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Education, Statistics and Probability

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b8580ded4d6465896d7310457b0b7ef84993b6fc

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Education

1. Keith Jones
2. Nathalie Sinclair
3. Allen Leung
4. M. G. Bartolini Bussi
5. Ulrich Kortenkamp
6. M. Villiers
7. K. Owens
8. Harpreet Kaur

In Statistics and Probability

1. Allen Leung
2. M. G. Bartolini Bussi
3. Nathalie Sinclair
4. Ulrich Kortenkamp
5. Keith Jones
6. M. Villiers
7. K. Owens

Citations in the corpus

• Recent research on geometry education: an ICME-13 survey team report (2016, background): “Studies of US geometry textbooks showed that students’ opportunities to engage with proof differ based on the textbooks they use and on their teachers’ instructional decisions (Sears & Chávez 2014), and even though there are relatively numerous reasoning-and-proving opportunities in the textbooks, i”