University-industry linkages in the UK: What are the factors underlying the variety of interactions with industry?

By Pablo D'Este, P. Patel. 2007

1,657 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/777a0e48d9ab33ea44c3768ef70fa958afd37ab7

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

In Strategy and Management

Citations in the corpus

University–industry relationships and open innovation: Towards a research agenda (2007, positive): “In addition, collaboration is not predicted by high rankings of university departments; by contrast, lower-ranked departments appear to generate more interactions (D'Este and Patel 2007).”
Is the entrepreneurial university also regionally engaged? Analysing the influence of university's structural configuration on third mission performance (2019, background): “Universities following the engaged model are characterized by other exchange activities that go beyond the commercialisation of research and IP protection which can be less visible, but equally or even more frequent (D'Este and Patel, 2007).”
Managing and incentivizing research commercialization in Chinese Universities (2010, background): “linkages embrace a much broader spectrum of activities (Cambridge-MIT Institute 2005; Cohen et al. 2002; D’Este and Patel 2007; Mowery et al. 2004).”
Universities and open innovation: the determinants of network centrality (2019, background): “The increased reliance on wider spatial knowledge pipelines is reflected by the growing number of firms choosing to work with the best universities regardless of location, in order to take advantage of high talent pools, favourable intellectual property rules and government incentives for joint indu”
Differences in technology transfer between science-based and development based industries: transfer mechanisms and barriers (2011, background): “We not only consider the role of formal mechanisms that especially facilitate the transfer of codified knowledge, as most prevalent in the literature until now (D’Este and Patel, 2007), but also include the role of informal mechanisms that are more relevant for the transfer of tacit knowledge (Ponom”
Beneath the tip of the iceberg: exploring the multiple forms of university–industry linkages (2011, neutral): “As a result, an increasing number of scholars are pointing to the need for further research on the variety of different types of collaborative links that exist between firms and universities (Laursen and Salter 2004; D‘Este and Patel 2007).”
The Economic and Innovation Contribution of Universities: A Regional Perspective (2009, background): “…(Meyer, 2003; Shane, 2004) that are highly involved in venturing and commercialisation activities such as the establishment of spin-off firms, and the exploitation of intellectual property rights through the licensing of technology and patent registration (D’Este and Patel, 2007; Huggins, 2008).”
Entrepreneurial practices in research-intensive and teaching-led universities (2016, background): “The outcomes of the entrepreneurial university manifest themselves through diverse entrepreneurial practices of its individual members (Ding and Choi 2001; D’Este and Patel 2007; Kirby et al. 2011; Urbano and Guerrero 2013; Abreu and Grinevich 2013).”
University knowledge and firm innovation: evidence from European countries (2014, background): “…have analyzed the transfer of knowledge generated in such relationships, centering their attention on the variety of knowledge transfer mechanisms (Bekkers and Bodas Freitas 2008; D’Este and Patel 2007; Geuna and Muscio 2009; Landry et al. 2010) and on the characteristics of involved actors.”
Best channels of academia–industry interaction for long-term benefit (2012, background): “From the PRO perspective, empirical evidence shows differences according to the nature and fields of research; individuals focused on applied research tend to favor the use of patents, human resources mobility, and collaborative research, while those involved in basic research favor publications and”