Searching high and low: what types of firms use universities as a source of innovation?
By Keld Laursen, Ammon J. Salter. 2004
1,213 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Management of Technology and Innovation, Strategy and Management
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/27b0102b6cb35cda35d6e70e46b8eaba774e1e5c
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Management of Technology and Innovation
- Keld Laursen
- Gabriela Dutrenit
- C. Fuentes
- Ammon J. Salter
- Markus Perkmann
- A. Muscio
- Elvira Uyarra
- Aldo Geuna
In Strategy and Management
- Marcel Bogers
- Keld Laursen
- Ammon J. Salter
- Markus Perkmann
- Kathryn Walsh
- Joel West
- Linus Dahlander
- David M. Gann
Citations in the corpus
- Open innovation in SMEs—An intermediated network model (2010, background): “According to Laursen and Salter (2004), it is not statistically evident that larger firms are better than SMEs in new-to-the-worldtype innovation, meaning that SMEs may well have capacity for innovation, especially radical innovation.”
- 1 Moving Beyond Schumpeter: Management Research on the Determinants of Technological Innovation (2008, background): “Does public science expand the research opportunity set of all firms in the same way? If not, under what conditions will given sets of firms be advantaged? For instance, Laursen and Salter ( 2004 ) draw attention to the fact that not all firms seek university research inputs and that there are syste”
- The paradox of openness: Appropriability, external search and collaboration (2014, methodology): “Following Laursen and Salter (2004, 2006), this measure has been used in numerous studies of open innovation to proxy for firm-level openness (see for example, Tether and Tajar, 2008; Grimpe and Sofka, 2009; Lee et al., 2010; Leiponen and Helfat, 2010; Garriga et al., 2013; Love et al., 2013).”
- Channels, benefits and risks of public–private interactions for knowledge transfer: conceptual framework inspired by Latin America (2010, background): “See Bonaccorsi and Piccaluga (1994), Hanel and St-Pierre (2006), Laursen and Salter (2004) and Vedovello (1998).”
- Conceptualizing the Regional Roles of Universities, Implications and Contradictions (2010, background): “Finally, surveys by Laursen and Salter (2004) and Fontana et al. (2006) suggest the openness of firms to the external environment to significantly affect the probability of interacting with universities.”