Corporate Social Responsibility: Three Key Approaches

By Duane Windsor. 2006

718 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Information Systems and Management, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/2507bea858c5f9602de56abc8c34470aa9ee000b

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Information Systems and Management

In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

In Strategy and Management

Citations in the corpus

How Corporate Social Responsibility Engagement Strategy Moderates the CSR–Financial Performance Relationship (2012, neutral): “However, for the global human rights dimension, the needed complementary skills may be lobbying experience with international organizations (Windsor, 2006).”
Firm Philanthropy in Small- and Medium-Sized Family Firms (2014, neutral): “We specified that philanthropy implies devolving part of the firm’s wealth to stakeholders in a discretionary way (Windsor, 2006) such as donating money for education, health, and the environment, or supporting nonprofit organizations.”
Corporate Social Responsibility and Corporate Governance: Role of Context in International Settings (2013, background): “…CSR has many definitions and connotations: from ‘business ethics or philanthropy or environmental policy’, ‘corporate social performance and corporate citizenship’ (McWilliams et al. 2006, p. 8; Secchi 2007; Windsor 2006) and ‘social accounting or corporate accountability’ (Crowther 2000).”
Organizing Corporate Social Responsibility in Small and Large Firms: Size Matters (2011, neutral): “In this study, we understand CSR as an umbrella term for the debate about the relationship and interactions between business and society and ‘‘any concept concerning how managers should handle public policy, social [and environmental] issues’’ (Windsor 2006, p. 93, our addition).”
Extrinsic and intrinsic drivers of corporate social performance: Evidence from foreign and domestic firms in Mexico (2010, neutral): “More importantly, if intrinsic, moral motivation is considered ethical while acquiescence to extrinsic pressures is economically prudent, one might argue that the two are in conflict (Windsor, 2006).”
Sustainability governance of chains and networks: a review and future outlook (2015, methodology): “The literature recognises that corporations are involved in improving their social and environmental performance and that they are increasingly required by different groups in society to do so (Bartley, 2003; Carroll and Shabana, 2010; Miller et al., 2010; Windsor, 2006); although this is still larg”
The Political Dynamics of Sustainable Coffee: Contested Value Regimes and the Transformation of Sustainability (2016, neutral): “This attention to the politics of CSR is a welcome development in a field long dominated by prescriptive assertions of the ethical duties of firms (Windsor, 2006), managerialist approaches to stakeholder management, and empirical explorations of the relationship between financial and”
Corporate responsibility: Reflections on context and consequences (2009, background): “…responsibility is a concept assuming that companies have responsibilities, which require them in certain situations to engage in activities beyond immediate financial interests of the firm and the mandatory obligations set by the legislation (Carroll 1979; Windsor 2006; McWilliams et al. 2006).”
The New Political Role of Business in a Globalized World – A Review of a New Perspective on CSR and its Implications for the Firm, Governance, and Democracy (2011, neutral): “However, as recent analyses have shown (Scherer and Palazzo 2007; Walsh 2005; Windsor 2006), also ethical approaches to CSR such as the philosophically inspired business ethics literature and the normative stakeholder approach have problems dealing with the post-national constellation and tackling c”
Strategic CSR: A Concept Building Meta‐Analysis (2019, neutral): “Referred to as a(n) ‘contestable’ (Windsor, 2006, p. 93), ‘elusive’ (Clarkson, 1995, p. 92), and even ‘epiphenomenal’ concept (Van Oosterhout and Heugens, 2008, p. 210), the main concern has always been that CSR is theoretically poorly defined (Rowley and Berman, 2000; Ullmann, 1985; Wood and…”
Corporate social responsibility, customer satisfaction, and financial performance: The moderating effect of the institutional environment in two transition economies (2017, background): “Overall, CSR has become an increasingly important subject among scholars of management (Godfrey et al., 2009; Windsor, 2006).”