Cyberbullying and its correlation to traditional bullying, gender and frequent and risky usage of internet-mediated communication tools

By Özgür Erdur-Baker. New Media & Society, 2010

539 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Education, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/2361f708c55a4cebd3ce73d58927dd4437ec1c44

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Education

In Social Psychology

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

Why Do Adults Engage in Cyberbullying on Social Media? An Integration of Online Disinhibition and Deindividuation Effects with the Social Structure and Social Learning Model (2016, background): “…cyberbullying in qualitative interview no university (range 12–25) Polish university students aged 12–25; sample size unreported (qualitative) Erdur-Baker (2010) yes (2.007 ) no self-report cyberbullying no teenagers (range 14–18) 276 adolescents (123 females, 151 males and 2 unknown)…”
Perceptions of School Climate as a Function of Bullying Involvement (2014, background): “Some studies have found girls to be more involved in cyberbullying (Rivers & Noret, 2010), whereas others have found boys to be more involved (Erdur-Baker, 2010; Slonje & Smith, 2008).”
Gender Differences in the Association Between Cyberbullying Victimization and Perpetration: The Role of Anger Rumination and Traditional Bullying Experiences (2020, background): “Erdur-Baker (2010) noted that there might be differences in the association between TB and CB experiences across gender.”
Understanding the relationship between experiencing workplace cyberbullying, employee mental strain and job satisfaction: a dysempowerment approach (2017, background): “As research has suggested a relationship between technology use and cyberbullying (Erdur-Baker, 2009; Rivers & Noret, 2010; Ybarra & Mitchell, 2004) we controlled for computer use at work and computer use at home.”
The Influence of Moral Disengagement, Morally Based Self-Esteem, Age, and Gender on Traditional Bullying and Cyberbullying (2013, background): “In terms of traditional bullying, the research overwhelmingly supports the contention that boys are more often involved in bullying than girls (e.g., Erdur-Baker, 2010; Feigenberg, King, Barr, & Selman, 2008; Jankauskiene et al., 2008; Wang, Iannotti, & Nansel, 2009).”
Cross-Cultural Differences in Cyberbullying Behavior (2014, background): “Some researchers have used measures that include a definition of cyberbullying (e.g., Beran & Li, 2007; Hinduja & Patchin, 2008; Jose, Kljakovic, Scheib, & Notter, 2012), whereas others do not (e.g., Ang et al., 2010; Boulton, Lloyd, Down, & Marx, 2012; Erdur-Baker, 2010).”
Exploring the Relationships Between Different Types of Facebook Use, Perceived Online Social Support, and Adolescents’ Depressed Mood (2016, background): “More specifically, boys are more involved in negative online conversations than girls, as one study found that boys are more likely to be victims of cyberbullying (Erdur-Baker, 2009).”
Bullying in the digital age: a critical review and meta-analysis of cyberbullying research among youth. (2014, background): “Additionally, several recent studies have found a link between cyberbullying victimization and perpetration and risky online behaviors (e.g., Bauman, 2010; Erdur-Baker, 2010; Walrave & Heirman, 2011).”
Cyberbullying among adolescents: Measures in search of a construct. (2014, unknown): “Moderate to strong positive relations between concurrent measures of cyberbullying and general measures of bullying have been found for adolescents in Canada (Li, 2007), Italy (Menesini, Nocentini, & Camodeca, 2013), Spain (Casas, Del Rey, & OrtegaRuiz, 2013), Turkey (Erdur-Baker, 2010), and the U.”
Cyber-bullying: An investigation of the psychological profile of university student participants (2014, background): “It is possible therefore that, due to the online disinhibition effect of CMC, CB can bemore retaliatory than face-to-face bullying (Erdur-Baker, 2010),while at the same time, cyber-victimsmay be empowered to engage in retaliatory attacks online.”
Moral Disengagement About Cyberbullying and Parental Monitoring: Effects on Traditional Bullying and Victimization via Cyberbullying Involvement (2018, background): “Previous research has shown large correlations between cyberbullying and cybervictimization (e.g., Balakrishnan, 2015; Erdu-Baker, 2010; Fanti, Demetriou, & Hawa, 2012; ŞAHİN, 2012).”
Answering Five Key Questions About Workplace Bullying (2012, background): “Although communication research has recently flourished in terms of cyberbullying and young adults (Erdur-Baker, 2010), organizational research in this area is quite sparse (for exception see Roberto & Eden, 2010).”
A meta-analysis of factors predicting cyberbullying perpetration and victimization: From the social cognitive and media effects approach (2017, background): “…conducted numerous studies to examine the predictors of cyberbullying from different perspectives, including media exposure (Akbulut et al., 2010; Erdur-Baker, 2010), personal factors (Grabe and Holfeld, 2012; Patchin and Hinduja, 2010), and environmental factors (Festl and Quandt, 2013; Xiao…”
Cyberbullying Definition Among Adolescents: A Comparison Across Six European Countries (2012, unknown): “The possible anonymity of the perpetrator is a unique feature of cyberbullying, 14,15,21–23 and it may intensify negative feelings in the victim, such as power-lessness.”