"Am I for real?" Predicting impostor tendencies from self-handicapping and affective components

By Shaun E. Cowman, Joseph R. Ferrari. 2002

141 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Impostors are individuals who believe their successes are not due to their own ability, but because of either luck or the notion that they must work harder than others. The relationship between impostor tendencies and different behavioral and affective variables was examined. With the present study's sample ( N = 436), controlling for social desirability, impostor tendencies were significantly correlated with behavioral self-handicapping ( r = .52, p < .001), and with shame-proneness ( r = .54, p < .001) more than guilt-proneness ( r = .28, p < .001). Regression analyses indicated that self-handicapping and shame-proneness were the best predictors of impostor tendencies ( R 2 = 0.43). Based on these results it seems that strong impostor tendencies are related to, and best predicted by, self-handicapping behaviors and shame prone affect.

Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/235102188b59f082431c48ccbf94cde7d1327190

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Clinical Psychology

  1. Holly M. Hutchins
  2. Gaetane Jean-Marie
  3. T. E. Dancy
  4. David Knights
  5. C. Clarke
  6. Marjolein Feys
  7. B. Wille
  8. Frederick Anseel

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

  1. Gaetane Jean-Marie
  2. T. E. Dancy
  3. Sabina Kleitman
  4. Marjolein Feys
  5. B. Wille
  6. Frederick Anseel
  7. Holly M. Hutchins
  8. Filip De Fruyt

In Social Psychology

  1. Holly M. Hutchins
  2. Gaetane Jean-Marie
  3. T. E. Dancy
  4. Sabina Kleitman
  5. Marjolein Feys
  6. B. Wille
  7. Frederick Anseel
  8. Filip De Fruyt

Citations in the corpus