Fostering Students' Epistemologies of Models via Authentic Model-Based Tasks
By Janice D. Gobert, Amy R. Pallant. 2004
122 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Developmental and Educational Psychology, Education
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/1eb812ad889954327fbe0d67c5f2f13544037dcc
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Developmental and Educational Psychology
- Laura M. O’Dwyer
- S. Oh
- Sharona T. Levy
- Barbara C. Buckley
- Uri Wilensky
- Janice D. Gobert
- P. Oh
- Paul Horwitz
In Education
- S. Oh
- P. Oh
- Barbara C. Buckley
- Uri Wilensky
- Laura M. O’Dwyer
- Sharona T. Levy
- Paul Horwitz
- Janice D. Gobert
Citations in the corpus
- Examining the Relationship Between Students’ Understanding of the Nature of Models and Conceptual Learning in Biology, Physics, and Chemistry (2011, methodology): “Lastly, Gobert and colleagues’ curriculum (Gobert & Pallant, 2004; Gobert, Slotta, et al., 2002; Gobert, Snyder, et al., 2002), which provided students with instruction about the nature of models in addition to engaging them in model-based inquiry tasks, yielded gains in students’ open-response…”
- What Teachers of Science Need to Know about Models: An overview (2011, background): “…evidence has been reported for positive effects of model-based pedagogies on science learning across different subject areas and grade levels (e.g. Gobert & Clement, 1999; Gobert & Pallant, 2004; Khan, 2007; Rotbain, Marbach-Ad, & Stavy, 2006; Schwarz & Gwekwerere, 2007; Schwarz & White, 2005).”
- Modeling-based learning in science education: cognitive, metacognitive, social, material and epistemological contributions (2012, unknown): “The significance of this is supported by the findings of Gobert and Pallant ( 2004 ) which illustrated the impact of students’ model epistemologies.”