Revisiting problems with foreign language aptitude

By A. Sáfár, Judit Kormos. 2008

109 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Developmental and Educational Psychology, Language and Linguistics, Literature and Literary Theory

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/1e6db68e254df1dbc6f220b04ce06d597cba4dce

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Developmental and Educational Psychology

1. Shaofeng Li
2. Luke Plonsky
3. Andrea Révész
4. Ali H. Al-Hoorie
5. Masatoshi Sato
6. Hossein Nassaji
7. F. Oswald
8. ZhaoHong Han

In Language and Linguistics

1. Shaofeng Li
2. Luke Plonsky
3. Andrea Révész
4. Ali H. Al-Hoorie
5. Masatoshi Sato
6. Hossein Nassaji
7. F. Oswald
8. E. Kang

In Literature and Literary Theory

1. Shaofeng Li
2. Luke Plonsky
3. Andrea Révész
4. Masatoshi Sato
5. Hossein Nassaji
6. F. Oswald
7. E. Kang
8. ZhaoHong Han

Citations in the corpus

• THE CONSTRUCT VALIDITY OF LANGUAGE APTITUDE (2015, methodology): “…on studies conducted before the 1990s when communicative/task-based instruction was not widely implemented; 50 are from foreign language classes in North America (48 in the United States) and only three from contexts outside of North America (Gordon, 1980 ; Keigtes, 1986 ; Sáfár & Kormos, 2008 ).”