Philanthropy, Integration or Innovation? Exploring the Financial and Societal Outcomes of Different Types of Corporate Responsibility

By M. Halme, J. Laurila. 2009

345 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Marketing, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/1c689469c7895b42ee3bf7dee9ffc79f755e0aac

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Marketing

In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

In Strategy and Management

Citations in the corpus

Corporate social responsibility and innovative capacity: Intersection in a macro-level perspective (2018, neutral): “5/34 alleviation of pressing environmental problems pertain to an important strand of the business literature that focuses on ecologically-oriented innovation and sustainable change (Hockerts 2003; Hockerts and Wüstenhagen 2010; Halme and Laurila, 2008).”
Corporate Social Responsibility in Developing Countries as an Emerging Field of Study (2018, neutral): “…Hess 2000; Fulmer et al. 2008; Muthuri et al. 2012; Pederson 2005); Sustainable community development (Arevalo and Aravind 2011; Arora and Kazmi 2012; Das 2009; Halme and Laurila 2009; Kolk and Lenfant 2013; Muthuri et al. 2012; Philip 2009) Other spillover effects from CSR: Legitimizing and/or…”
Sustainability as corporate culture of a brand for superior performance (2013, background): “Halme and Laurilla (2009) investigated the relationship between corporate responsibility and financial performance of large firms and found that corporate responsibility when pursued strategically by firms contributes less to the financial performance of the company – philanthropic activities in par”
Corporate responsibility: Reflections on context and consequences (2009, background): “solving social and environmental problems (Halme and Laurila 2009).”
Corporate Social Responsibility, Product Differentiation Strategy and Export Performance (2010, result): “This implies that, in contrast to studies that have adopted a universal approach to CSR (e.g. Barnett and Salomon, 2006; Halme and Laurila, 2009), our results suggest that context seems to matter when it comes to the relationship between strategic CSR and performance.”
When Does It Pay to be Good? Moderators and Mediators in the Corporate Sustainability–Corporate Financial Performance Relationship: A Critical Review (2017, background): “Based on a theoretical reasoning grounded in either strategic decision making (Brammer and Millington 2008; Dixon-Fowler et al. 2013; Halme and Laurila 2009) or microeconomics (Husted and Salazar 2006), it is more beneficial for firms to follow a proactive rather than a reactive approach.”
The Impact of Four Types of Corporate Social Performance on Reputation and Financial Performance (2015, background): “Several studies have contributed to identifying CSP aspects (Carroll 1979, 1991; Schwartz and Carroll 2003; Porter and Kramer 2006; Kourula and Halme 2008; Halme and Laurila 2009).”