Temporal Diversity and Team Performance: The Moderating Role of Team Temporal Leadership

By Susan Mohammed, Sucheta Nadkarni. 2011

317 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/1bf8d982c1611b285d4c7d495d665a73c202041b

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

Time in organizational research: Catching up on a long neglected topic in order to improve theory (2012, background): “Mohammed and Nadkarni (2011) introduced team temporal leadership as ‘‘the degree to which team leaders schedule deadline, synchronize team member behaviors, and allocate temporal resources’’ (p.”
Nonverbal Behavior and Communication in the Workplace (2016, background): “For example, Mohammed and Nadkarni (2011) showed that temporal team leaders, those who help structure, coordinate, and manage the pacing of work, have positive influences on team performance, especially when teams differ in temporal composition.”
Revisiting followership through a social identity perspective: the role of collective follower emotion and action (2013, background): “…& Moreland, 2004; Burke, Stagl, Salas, Pierce, & Kendall, 2006; Hackman, 2012; Marks, Mathieu, & Zaccaro, 2001), temporal perspectives have recently emerged in the group dynamics literature and in the leadership and organization literature (e.g., Mohammed & Nadkarni, 2011, Sonnentag, 2012).”
It’s about Time! CEOs’ Temporal Dispositions, Temporal Leadership, and Corporate Entrepreneurship (2017, methodology): “Mohammed and Nadkarni (2011) conceptualized, operationalized, and validated the construct of temporal leadership in teams.”
It’s About Time: New Perspectives and Insights on Time Management (2017, background): “Selection, in some cases, might be beneficial because diversity in time-related individual differences can backfire—a recent body of research shows that temporal diversity in teams can hurt performance (Mohammed & Nadkarni, 2011).”
A Dynamic Perspective on Diverse Teams: Moving from the Dual-Process Model to a Dynamic Coordination-based Model of Diverse Team Performance (2016, background): “For example, effective leadership that involves the ongoing coordination of activities like keeping the group on schedule and ensuring there is enough time for task completion moderates the negative effects of temporal diversity (Mohammed & Nadkarni, 2011).”
Folding Under Pressure or Rising to the Occasion? Perceived Time Pressure and the Moderating Role of Team Temporal Leadership (2014, methodology): “By allocating temporal resources (e.g., building in time for dealing with problems), strong team temporal leadership provides a context in which teams are able to resolve conflicts and manage emotions through interpersonal processes (Mohammed & Nadkarni, 2011).”
The “Other” Time: A Review of the Subjective Experience of Time in Organizations (2020, background): “T Team temporal leadership – Team leader behaviors related to time (i.e., scheduling, synchronizing, and allocating resources) to address perceived issues of ambiguity, conflict, and scarcity of time (Mohammed & Nadkarni, 2011*; see also McGrath & Rotchford, 1983**).”
It’s Not Just What is Said, but When it’s Said: A Temporal Account of Verbal Behaviors and Emergent Leadership in Self-Managed Teams (2019, background): “A growing body of literature encourages researchers to explicitly consider the role of time in leadership theories (e.g., Castillo & Trinh, 2018; Mitchell & James, 2001; Mohammed & Nadkarni, 2011; Shamir, 2011).”
The Pre-Deal Phase of Mergers and Acquisitions: A Review and Research Agenda (2020, background): “The literatures related to decision making under time constraints (e.g., Kocher & Sutter, 2006), temporal group cognition (e.g., Mohammed & Nadkarni, 2011), or intertemporal choice (e.g., Loewenstein, 1988) could provide useful theoretical starting points for developing predictions for this type of…”