School psychologist assessment practices in the evaluation of students referred for social/behavioral/emotional problems
By E. Shapiro, Patrick F. Heick. 2004
124 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Developmental and Educational Psychology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/190905a2b856a9a798c298f2bb06d8f4cb4d7ed4
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Clinical Psychology
- Sandra M. Chafouleas
- T. C. Riley-Tillman
- F. Gresham
- Theodore J. Christ
- R. Volpe
- John M. Hintze
- Clayton R. Cook
- James Clyde DiPerna
In Cognitive Neuroscience
- Sandra M. Chafouleas
- F. Gresham
- R. Volpe
- T. C. Riley-Tillman
- Theodore J. Christ
- Clayton R. Cook
- James Clyde DiPerna
- John M. Hintze
In Developmental and Educational Psychology
- Sandra M. Chafouleas
- Theodore J. Christ
- T. C. Riley-Tillman
- James Clyde DiPerna
- F. Gresham
- Clayton R. Cook
- R. Volpe
- E. Shapiro
Citations in the corpus
- Observing Students in Classroom Settings: A Review of Seven Coding Schemes (2005, methodology): “Systematic observation of student behavior is among the most common assessment methodologies utilized by school psychologists (Shapiro & Heick, 2004; Wilson & Reschly, 1996) and is viewed as one of the most objective and direct measurement tools available for the assessment of child behavior.”
- School-Based Behavioral Assessment Within Problem-Solving Models: Current Status and Future Directions (2010, methodology): “Indeed, owing to convenience, cost effectiveness, and generally strong psychometric properties, rating scales have become one of the most commonly used assessment tools among school psychologists (Shapiro & Heick, 2004).”
- Foundation for the Development and Use of Direct Behavior Rating (DBR) to Assess and Evaluate Student Behavior (2009, methodology): “Aside from individual intelligence and achievement tests, methods rated with the highest level of usage were contextually based and informant methods rather than projective, personality, and analog testing (Shapiro & Heick, 2004).”