Small firms under MICROSCOPE: international differences in production/operations management practices and performance
By Raffaella Cagliano, Kate Blackmon, C. Voss. 2001
194 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Strategy and Management
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/16e6048b5dde50de607acddf444593bc9501614e
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Economics and Econometrics
- C. Voss
- Christopher McDermott
- Rodney McAdam
- Thomas McConvery
- G. Armstrong
- Christos Fotopoulos
- Daniel I. Prajogo
- David Gallear
In Strategy and Management
- C. Voss
- Rui Soucasaux Sousa
- Christopher McDermott
- Rodney McAdam
- Thomas McConvery
- G. Armstrong
- G. Maglaras
- S. Deshmukh
Citations in the corpus
- Barriers to innovation within small firms in a peripheral location (2004, methodology): “To minimise the effect of organisational size, the case organisations were all in the 11-100 employee band, where management systems have been developed to at least some degree without being overly rigid ( Cagliano et al. , 2001”
- Contingency research in operations management practices (2008, background): “While studies addressing quality management found no evidence of firm size effects (e.g., Ahire and Golhar, 1996), studies addressing lean manufacturing and general manufacturing best practices have found support for such effects (e.g., Cagliano et al., 2001; Shah and Ward, 2003).”
- Examining the effects of contextual factors on TQM and performance through the lens of organizational theories: An empirical study (2007, background): “For instance, small and medium-sized companies (SMCs) have flatter management structures and higher flexibility than large companies (McAdam and McKeown, 1999), more customer orientation, less complexity and better communication due to informal relationships (Cagliano et al., 2001) and are more like”
- Service innovation and performance in SMEs (2012, result): “The cut-off point of 250 is consistent with that adopted by European Commissions, and has been used widely in a number of other studies (Cagliano et al., 2001; Mosey et al., 2002; McAdam et al., 2004).”
- Strategy development by SMEs for competitiveness: a review (2008, background): “World class SMEs develop themselves through diversification and extended networks ( Cagliano et al. , 2001”
- Firm size and sustainable performance in food supply chains: Insights from Greek SMEs (2014, background): “These can, in turn, create a pervasive and less imitable set of processes and a basis for competitive advantage for these firms and associated chain members (Carter and Dresner, 2001). As Flint and Golicic (2009) observe, not surprisingly, sustainability has received increasing attention in the lite”
- Longitudinal evaluation of innovation implementation in SMEs (2005, background): “), with a strong external focus on multiple stakeholders ( Cagliano et al. , 2001”