Examining the factor structure of participant reactions to training: A multidimensional approach

By Ronald B. Morgan, W. Casper. 2000

148 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Applied Psychology, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/152174558ba14a8abd747bef2c839a81a88738c3

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Applied Psychology

In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

In Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Citations in the corpus

Evaluating Training Programs: Development and Correlates of the Questionnaire for Professional Training Evaluation (2013, background): “Morgan and Casper (2000) examined the underlying factor structure of reaction items in different training courses and found six latent factors (e.g. satisfaction with the instructor and perceived training utility).”
Benefits of training and development for individuals and teams, organizations, and society. (2009, background): “Morgan & Casper (2000) factor analyzed a set of training reaction items from 9128 government employees and found evidence of two underlying factors: overall affect toward training and perceived utility of the training.”
Holton's Evaluation Model: New Evidence and Construct Elaborations (2005, background): “Morgan and Casper (2000) conducted a factor analytic study of a large database of responses to a multidimensional reaction instrument.”
Adaptation of Kirkpatrick’s Four-Level Model of Training Criteria to Evaluate Training Programmes for Head Teachers (2021, background): “Whereas Kirkpatrick’s original work was unclear about the types of question that trainees should be asked in relation to their reactions and how the reaction concept should be used, Brown, Morgan and Casper, and Tan et al. [67,70,71] support the notion that the nature of reaction is multidimensional”
The relationship between learner utility reactions and predicted learning transfer among trainees (2002, background): “Morgan and Casper (2000) assert that many of the reaction measures used in past studies were poorly designed and unreliable, and call for a multi-dimensional approach to evaluation measures.”