An Examination of the Relationship Between Academic Dishonesty and Workplace Dishonesty: A Multicampus Investigation
By Sarath A. Nonis, C. Swift. 2001
527 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Information Systems and Management, Safety Research, Social Psychology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/1363e0870dbe05ff7580bdd208057c2e1dd77af0
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Information Systems and Management
- I. Jawahar
- T. Stone
- Jennifer L. Kisamore
- Cynthia J. Finelli
- Trevor S. Harding
- Donald D. Carpenter
- A. de Vries
- M. Brimble
In Safety Research
- I. Jawahar
- T. Stone
- Jennifer L. Kisamore
- G. Curtis
- L. Vardanega
- M. Brimble
- P. Stevenson-Clarke
- Aurora A. C. Teixeira
In Social Psychology
- A. de Vries
- H. Rudnick
- Aurora A. C. Teixeira
- L. Vardanega
- M. F. Rocha
- Reinout E. de Vries
- Cynthia J. Finelli
- Trevor S. Harding
Citations in the corpus
- Broad versus narrow traits: Conscientiousness and honesty–humility as predictors of academic criteria (2011, background): “Nonis and Swift (2001) suggest that it is important to increase students’ awareness and understanding of what is unethical behaviour, and offer some techniques for encouraging ethical behaviour among students such as specific ethics classes to learn ethical decision-making.”
- Perceptions of the prevalence and seriousness of academic dishonesty in Australian universities (2005, background): “ Nonis and Swift (2001) argued for a more fundamental approach involving the teaching of integrity and discussion of ethical issues in every course, with particular emphasis in the capstone courses, rather than just in specialised ethics classes.”
- What’s My Style? The Influence of Top Managers on Voluntary Corporate Financial Disclosure (2010, unknown): “B.A. than other graduate programs McCabe et al. 2006 , and individuals who behave dishonstly as students are more likely to behave dishonestly in the workplace Nonis and Swift 2001 , uggesting M.B.A.s might be more likely to issue disclosures that spin the firm’s outlook.”
- An Investigation of College Students’ Perceptions of Academic Dishonesty, Reasons for Dishonesty, Achievement Goals, and Willingness to Report Dishonest Behavior (2013, unknown): “The current study confirms the relationship between student AD in school and ethical decision making in the workplace (e.g., Brubaker, 2003; Harding, Carpenter, Finelli, & Passow, 2004; Hsiao & Yang, 2011; Lawson, 2004; Nonis & Swift, 2001; Sims, 1993).”
- Predicting Academic Misconduct Intentions and Behavior Using the Theory of Planned Behavior and Personality (2010, background): “…is disconcerting in light of empirical evidence of associations between academic misconduct and both endorsement and engagement in unethical workplace behaviors (McCabe, Treviño, & Butterfield, 1996; Nonis & Swift, 2001; Sims, 1993; Treviño, Weaver, & Reynolds, 2006; Weber & Gillespie, 1998).”
- Cheating by economics and business undergraduate students: an exploratory international assessment (2010, background): “…behaviour in the real business world is far from being unambiguously proven (‘‘surrogates are not real and can only approximate what may occur’’), Nonis and Swift (2001) found that business students who engaged in fraudulent behaviour in class were more likely to engage in fraudulent…”
- Is plagiarism changing over time? A 10-year time-lag study with three points of measurement (2016, background): “But, even questions that lend themselves to longitudinal designs, such as links between educational and workplace cheating, are typically only examined cross-sectionally (Nonis & Swift, 2001).”
- The Theory of Planned Behavior as a Model of Academic Dishonesty in Engineering and Humanities Undergraduates (2007, result): “This finding supports previous work that showed that past cheating is related to unethical behavior later in life ( Nonis & Swift, 2001 ; Sims, 1993 ).”
- FACTORS INFLUENCING ENGINEERING STUDENTS’ DECISIONS TO CHEAT BY TYPE OF ASSESSMENT (2006, methodology): “The prevalence and increasing severity of cheating should be distressing to educators because of their implications for: (1) undermining institutional missions that include preparation for citizenship and service to society, each of which has a moral dimension (King and Mayhew, 2002; Whitley and Kei”
- Integrating Altruism and the Theory of Planned Behavior to Predict Patronage Intention of a Green Hotel (2015, background): “70 recommended by Nunnally and Bernstein (1994). The composite reliability of each construct was between .”
- Big five personality and academic dishonesty: A meta-analytic review. (2015, background): “Indeed, students who cheat in an academic context are more likely to do so at work (Blankenship & Whitley, 2000; Nonis & Swift, 2001; Stone, Jawahar, & Kisamore, 2011).”
- Examining the Cheats: The Role of Conscientiousness and Excitement Seeking in Academic Dishonesty (2007, background): “Recent research by Nonis and Swift (2001) showed a strong positive correlation between academic dishonesty and work place dishonesty (r = 0.”