Students’ positions and considerations of scientific evidence about a controversial socioscientific issue

By V. Albe. 2008

112 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Developmental and Educational Psychology, Education, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/1095e338b0bb48e7736d257b317f96171f34b072

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Developmental and Educational Psychology

1. M. Evagorou
2. M. Jiménez-Aleixandre
3. Shu-Nu Chang Rundgren
4. Carl-Johan Rundgren
5. Jonathan Osborne
6. Katherine L. McNeill
7. V. Dawson
8. Vasilia Christidou

In Education

1. M. Evagorou
2. M. Jiménez-Aleixandre
3. Shu-Nu Chang Rundgren
4. Carl-Johan Rundgren
5. Jonathan Osborne
6. Katherine L. McNeill
7. V. Dawson
8. Vasilia Christidou

In Social Psychology

1. Shu-Nu Chang Rundgren
2. Carl-Johan Rundgren
3. Jonathan Osborne
4. M. Evagorou

Citations in the corpus

• SEE-SEP: From a separate to a holistic view on socio-scientific issues (2010, methodology): “However, there seems to be a consensus that the important features of SSIs include complexity, multiple perspectives, inquiry and scepticism (Albe, 2008; Colucci-Gray et al., 2006; Fensham, 2008; Sadler et al., 2007; Simonneaux & Simonneaux, 2009).”
• ‘Should We Kill the Grey Squirrels?’ A Study Exploring Students’ Justifications and Decision-Making (2012, background): “Jimenez-Aleixandre & Pereiro-Munoz, 2002 ; Kolsto, 2006 ; Ratcliffe, 1996 ), conceptual understanding (e.”