Implicit affect in organizations

By Sigal G. Barsade, Lakshmi Ramarajan, Drew Westen. 2009

109 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Applied Psychology, Clinical Psychology, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/1089086e0ceb3d335b60e3a0c6ddd33638b1a854

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Applied Psychology

1. Joel Koopman
2. Russell E. Johnson
3. Michael Howe
4. Alan G. Sanfey
5. Jochen I. Menges
6. E. Uhlmann
7. Russell S. Cropanzano

In Clinical Psychology

1. Michael Howe
2. Russell E. Johnson
3. Jochen I. Menges
4. Joel Koopman
5. W. Becker
6. Russell S. Cropanzano

In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

1. Russell E. Johnson
2. Joel Koopman
3. Michael Howe
4. Alan G. Sanfey
5. Jochen I. Menges
6. W. Becker
7. Russell S. Cropanzano
8. Christian Vandenberghe

Citations in the corpus

• Thinking critically about affect in organization studies: Why it matters (2017, unknown): “For instance, Barsade et al. (2009) integrate the construct of implicit affect – with a more conscious emotional experience – into the field of organizational behaviour.”
• Organizational Neuroscience: Taking Organizational Theory Inside the Neural Black Box (2011, background): “A number of authors have asserted that nonconscious processes need to play a greater role in organizational theory (Barsade et al., 2009; Dane & Pratt, 2007; George, 2009).”
• Getting Explicit About the Implicit (2012, background): “This has led to calls by researchers to pay greater attention to implicit processing within organizations (e.g., Barsade et al., 2009; Bing, LeBreton, et al., 2007; Haines & Sumner, 2006).”