Reexamining the Circumplex Model of Affect

By Nancy A. Remington, L. Fabrigar, P. S. Visser. 2000

89 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/0f22711420094c6c94d7822a8b5f85ff951250ac

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Clinical Psychology

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

Citations in the corpus

The Structure of Affect: Reconsidering the Relationship Between Negative and Positive Affectivity (2003, result): “With a few exceptions the results of this work have been generally consistent with the findings for similarity ratings (e.g.,Feldman, 1995a, 1995b; Mayer & Gaschke, 1988; Meyer & Shack, 1989; Remington et al., 2000).”
Analysis of the affect measurement conundrum in exercise psychology: IV. A conceptual case for the affect circumplex (2002, methodology): “Similarly, the latest circumplex-specific models of structural analysis have yet to be used for the purpose of scale development (Browne, 1992; Fabrigar et al., 1997; Remington et al., 2000; Yik et al., 1999).”
Work-Family Conflict as a Cause for Turnover Intentions in the Hospitality Industry (2010, methodology): “The fi ve items were derived from a validated questionnaire used in many studies (see, for example, Yik et al , 1999 ; Remington et al , 2000 ).”
How to Think About and Measure Psychological Well-Being (2012, background): ““negative affect” (NA), they in fact tap only certain kinds of those – high-arousal feelings in the two upper segments of Figure 1 (e.g., Remington et al., 2000; Tellegen, Watson, & Clark, 1999).”
Emotion regulation in customer service roles: testing a model of emotional labor. (2003, methodology): “This was measured using Schutte et al.’s (1998) 33-item measure of emotional intelligence ( .”
Machine Recognition of Music Emotion: A Review (2012, background): “…of emotion: valence (or pleasantness; positive and negative affective states), arousal (or activation; energy and stimulation level), and potency (or dominance; a sense of control or freedom to act) [Osgood et al. 1957; Plutchik 1980; Remington et al. 2000; Thayer 1989; Whissell et al. 1986].”
Affect and the Functional Bases of Behavior: On the Dimensional Structure of Affective Experience (2001, background): “However, I do not believe it should be viewed as a “gold standard” regarding the nature and underpinnings of affects (for discussion of other problems with these models, see Remington, Fabrigar, & Visser, 2000; Watson et al., 1999).”