How to Think About and Measure Psychological Well-Being

By P. Warr. 2012

142 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Leadership behaviour and leader self-reported well-being: A review, integration and meta-analytic examination (2020, background): “valence, temporal stability and domain specificity of well-being indicators (Warr, 2013), we provide a fine-grained understanding of its relation with leadership.”
The longitudinal development of employee well-being: a systematic review (2016, background): “…d by [ U ni ve rs ity L ib ra ry U tr ec ht ] at 0 6: 25 1 0 A pr il 20 16 As proposed by Bakker and Oerlemans (2011; see also Mäkikangas et al., 2015; Salanova et al., 2014), these four quadrants correspond to the four widely used states of employee cognitive-affective well-being (Warr, 2013).”
Leadership behavior and employee well-being: An integrated review and a future research agenda (2018, background): “The need for better inclusion of time is further magnified by the conception of employee well-being, which can be measured as state or trait well-being (e.g., Warr, 2013) – a point that is often not explicitly addressed in studies.”
Entrepreneurs’ Mental Health and Well-Being: A Review and Research Agenda (2018, background): “At the other end, we find well-being i.e. the experience of “living in a state that is in some sense good” (Warr, 2013, p. 77), characterized by feelings of satisfaction, happiness or “optimal psychological functioning and experience” (Ryan & Deci, 2001, p.142).”